Ohh After Eight, when you're done lecturing on Reading Comprehension you can try practicing it yourself. You were criticizing "the 'so-called' educators" and oncemorewithfeeling2 was referring to the situation that you yourself were just criticizing in the above post. If the educators aren't even worth being called educators, but 'so-called' educators, then surely that is a situation in need of change?
Two alternatives remain: either you believe that calling our educators "'so-called' educators" is not a situation worth addressing and remain puzzled by how what you have alleged is critical -- or you have a dissociative disorder and literally do not acknowledge what you yourself said.
Returning to the topic at hand, I do think there is merit in terms of "HAMILTON spoilers" in the sense of avoiding spoiling what choices Miranda & Co. have made in their telling of his story. The story itself is history, but as Miranda seems very keen to point out with this show, how you tell the history is very much the point.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.
