IMHO, it all depends on the source material in terms of how well you can tolerate repeat viewings. I sat through GREEN BIRD three times and loved it all the more with each viewing, but with LION KING, once you get past the production style and realize there's nothing under it (I mean, please, if you're going to do HAMLET, then do HAMLET), it loses all around.
And frankly, that's what happens with most Disney shows. BATB is all eye candy and not a very good book or score to support it. TARZAN -- well, the less said there the better, I think: they were trying desperately to recreate the initial magic of LK, and it failed miserably. It's running now only because of the Disney name and not because of any inherent quality.
This is why I'm all the more suspicious of LITTLE MERMAID, even tho the BBW hype machine will give me grief about judging a show before seeing it. They've hired a technical and design team that are well known for their high concept work outside musical theatre. It's not much of a story (C'mon, Anderson's original tale isall of five pages, and that's in large print!) and not much of a score with it. But we will see the Disney machine kick in faster than you can say "Under the Sea", and no matter how scathing the reviews, it will run for a decade, if not more.
But when you look at the entire Disney catalog, there's not much that could survive the move to stage without a *lot* of lip gloss applied on top. Even my personal favourite, HERCULES, would have trouble because of story issues that would have to change things radically for it to succeed -- and Disney isnt exactly well known for its ability to adapt.
http://docandraider.com