tazber said: "I'm pulling for this show.
I don't really know why since all I know about is from this thread, but it looks colorful and fun.
The show will live or die on Blackhurst, and by all accounts so far she's doing a great job."
Oh, Honey... I sooooo love your optimism, but (even as a former Chicago actor, knowing not one, but two really talented Chicago actors I've worked with in the past who are in this production) despite all good intentions, the current Chicago reviewers make good sense.
There are a lot of strikes against the show that have not been addressed in the writing. Additionally, the score (with minimal exception) is pretty run-of-the-mill. Some plot/character elements are just plain "wrong" (and I use quotation marks purposefully).
Optimistically, anything can happen, but like the premiere of "Beaches" at Drury Lane Oakbrook, the hype of presenting a world premiere, pre-Broadway production doesn't always match up with the reality of a quality show that will absolutely play on Broadway.
Not a negative... just how things play out.
EDIT: And for the record, Drury Lane Oakbrook produces many, many excellent productions. It's my understanding that the recent premiers of Beaches and Hazel are primarily due to the hiring of one, particular associate (who's name has been published in the past, but unfortunately escapes me, now).
Kudos to her (DANG IT... I'll update if I can find her name again...) for takin' a chance!
Updated On: 4/9/16 at 04:10 PM