How do you feel about Gwen Stafani's "Rich Girl"?- Page 3

[Rathnait62]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:18pm

"Actualy, no Rath. My English prof (who doesn't no Bway and is not Jewish) was the first to bring up the fact that she thought it was disrespectful."

Oh WELL then. I take it all back. Although from your spelling there, she's about as good a prof as she is a music/content critic.

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:20pm

And BSo, don't get your claws out at me just because I cut you down. You act like a pretentious know-all to my friend, and you will hear about it.

[Thenardier]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:21pm

That's isn't what I meant...I mean that I am obviously not the only person that feels that way.

And take Tiff's advice JUST THE SAME!

(P.S. I am studying Spanish - and BWW isn't high on priorities...)

And, "Do you want other people to learn about Broadway or not?"

Yes, I do. Stefani's version of the song is NOT BROADWAY. And until the comes on the radio with the announcer saying, "From the hit Broadway show, Fiddler on the Roof, now playing at the Minskoff Theatre. Tickets can be purchased...." I will say GREAT! Until then, not many people know it is Broadway. When I say something they say, "Oh reall?" Or they say, "NO! I know Fiddler and this isn't that song!"

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:31pm

I hope my grade 9 Spanish pays off.

Para una persona con cuatro nombres aquí, si BWW no es una alta prioridad, no sé cuál es.

Translation: For someone with four names here, if BWW is not a high priority, I don't know what is.


Now apologize to Rath (and myself) for your unjustifiably snarky remarks, and continue this conversation like a grown-up.

[Thenardier]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:34pm

No hice el papel de un "know-it-all," gracias. Y te he explicado todo sobre mis nombrs - otra vex, gracias.

And I never said anything "bad" to Rath - other thank I will stick with my opinions.

But thank you, TIff, for jumping in in the middle of the convo.

Updated On: 4/17/05 at 11:34 PM

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:44pm

Your passive-aggressiveness would do a Canadian proud.

Starting off a typed passage with, "Well, let's see now..." is the equivalent of starting off a typed passage with, "Umm..." or "Uhh..." You're not actually pondering the thought as you speak; you're typing so you have all the time in the world to make things eloquent. Therefore, when you start a passage with any of those three, it implies that you're dumbing down a statement for a lesser individual to understand.

I asked you nicely to knock off your condescending tone. You replied, "And Tiff, you stay in your corner..." Sorry, I'm not a boxer and I'm not a mental patient, nor am I your dog, so you have no corner to send me to.

Furthermore, your overuse of "Thank you." (i.e. "I did NOT say hymn. Thank you." and "But thank you, TIff, for jumping in in the middle of the convo.") is clearly a condescending quirk meant to, I suppose, put us in our place with your poor use of sarcasm.

But you are most welcome for me jumping in the middle of the conversation. You could be a good kid with valid points, but your tone sucks.

[Thenardier]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:48pm

Well, let's see know - when I start a post off with that it means I have two different ideas (on one hand and on the other hand)....

And, as I have re-edited my post - it was not meant to sound rude. The thank you to you, however, yeah - you took it the right way...

[Ellie3]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:51pm

Hi!

a) Gwen is 100% fab, and can do no wrong.
b) Rath is 100% fab, and can do no wrong.
c) Tiff is 100% fab, and can do no wrong.

That's all.

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 4/17/05 at 11:55pm

I question the ordering of those three lovely ladies, but your general idea is 100% fab, and can do no wrong.

And Bso, I know I took it the right way. Refer to Ellie's above statement.