Posted: 8/14/15 at 4:36pm
Whizzer, I'm very glad to hear of your experience with Fun Home. It's a brilliant show and a groundbreaking one. That's where the show's power lies: it shows us something we haven't seen before. For that reason, it's vital, and I think the fact that people are calling it one of the most important musicals in decades speaks not just to the strength of Fun Home, but to the general weakness of shows around it... Museum pieces that exist without the vitality. That are shaped and formed with the intent of being commercial. And they never, ever change. The whole 'if it isn't broken, don't fix it' idea is observed, the show fails to transcend itself, it stays within it's own safe confines, and it dies a quiet death. Fun Home's artistic aspirations far exceeded its commercial ones, and I think that fact was integral to its success.
That's what we want out of theatre. Broadway is stigmatized as a place to see flashy song and dance... But the shows with the most recent and significant impact where the ones that subverted that. They have, in other words, breathed that new life and vitality into theatre. They are doing something that is so NOW. They are a product of their time, as were other similarly impact flu shows before them.
THAT'S where the life is for me. When a show is quite literally present. The actors and the audience are there working in tandem, the audience is anything BUT a passive observer. The actors are aware of the audience, and vice versa. They are living and breathing in the same space.
I think we see this way less than we should. And that's what I think will save the theatre, if it is indeed dying as I perceive it to be.
Updated On: 8/14/15 at 04:36 PM