In all seriousness, place your bets:- Page 2

[mormonophobic]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 2:22am

I saw without a doubt by 2020. But not before then. I've been trying to think of what a Rent revival would even be like and really trying to just think of different ways they could go to make it totally different (think competing versions of Company or Chicago) and am drawing a blank. But yeah, I don't think a revival of this would have any impact if they don't wait at least twelve years or so.

[HITcards]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 2:24am

They couldn't pull a les miz. When les miz announced it was closing, it was still selling fairly well (obviously not well enough to stay open, but still pretty good). Rent on the other hand, the week before closing was announced was grossing $265K at 54.5% with an average ticket of $51. It couldn't financially pull a les miz. Sorry to those who were hoping for it.

[Urban]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 5:35am

I now have this image of it being revived in 15 years time and they are wheeling out (literally) the original cast from their retirement condos in Palm Beach to open the revival. Catheders, wheelchairs and all!

[blondebaby589]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 7:30am

10

[GatorNY]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 7:36am

I agree with Trekkie and say no sooner tha 15-20 years. (if they are smart) Revisiting Hair this summer is especially interesting because the generation that it was about is now the age that Claude's parents are in the show. They whoever they are)should wait until all of the rentheads have kids that are teenagers, so that they can give the show to the next generation.

Updated On: 9/8/08 at 07:36 AM

[TonyVincent]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 9:48am

The Hair comparison is interesting, and it makes me wonder about how timeless Rent will be.

Hair emphasized (i.e., hit you over the head in a pre-show intro, at least at the performance I went to) its relevance because of war/conflict/political sruggle, which will always exist.

Will further generations be able to connect with the HIV/AIDS epidemic? Yes, I know there's much more to the show than that, and it's about the greater connection with the material and the characters. But if health conditions hopefully continue to improve, HIV is mostly eradicated/contained, and it's not longer a focal point of health education for America's youth (and they haven't experienced it like most of us have), will it speak to future generations as much?

[HollyDiver]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 9:54am

10 years is my guess.

[GatorNY]

Posted: 9/8/08 at 10:04am

Either the medical and science fields will have found a cure or a vaccine to prevent HIV, or we will still be losing friends and family to the disease. If the former is the case, it will have relevance from an historical standpoint, like La Bohème. Most of us don't deal with tuberculosis or even have heard of consumption. However, we would be able to connect to the loss. If we are still losing the battle, then it will have the same impact that it had today. The impact is less now though than it was in 1996. The youth coming up now are not as fearful of getting infected as we were back in the late 80's and early 90's. Sadly many people think that it is something that if they get infected with, that they can manage it long term.

[dg22894]

Posted: 11/2/08 at 6:26pm

I am saying 10-20 years and at Encores! and transfers or it could pull a Gypsy and have one like every 3-5 years and with new leads with big names

[KathyGriffinLovesYou]

Posted: 11/2/08 at 6:30pm

TOMORROW!

when I typed that I was thinking 6.
Jesus Christ Superstar in 6 years I'll be in 13th grade.

[bundy5000]

Posted: 11/2/08 at 7:07pm

Instead of RENT it will be called "Mortgage"

[Mr Roxy]

Posted: 11/2/08 at 7:26pm

At least 10 years.

[sabrelady]

Posted: 11/3/08 at 4:52pm

5-10 years.
With time off for good behavior/time served- 7 yrs