"Shakespeare didnt write all those amazing plays with ice cream sales in mind. Also consider back then most of the audience were standing. "
Yeah you woulda loved playgoing in Shakespeare's days--the audience was noisy the whole time, in the groundlings areas people often peed right then and there, people sold food and other things DURING the play, etc.
I think many authors are happy to have an intermission. Sometimes it also is to the benefit of a performer (ballet performances nearly always have two intermissions simply because the dancers need a break). Sometimes set changes and other major things are also built in there. And for certain plays (Sunday in the Park, Into the Woods and Fantasticks all being obvious examples) the two act sturcture helps shape the piece.
I don't get how you can flatly say you never like intermissions--I think it depends on the piece. Sondheim even thougt that Follies SHOULD have an intermission--in the ned he fought to have one (and lost with the original production).
I'm a young healthy guy, and I have to admit but usually past the 2 hour and 30 mins point I have to go to the bathroom--yeah I can hold it in but it's not too pleasant. I also am tall, and often theatres have very bad legroom for me (I could go on but everyone's said the basic reasons).
Also theatre is a social event--I kidna enjoy havign a drink at intermission hearing whatpeople think of the work so much, getting to stand outside maybe for a bit in the gorgeous night air and think about what I've seen so far and can expect to see coming up, etc etc...
(I went to a brilliant opera performance of Don GIovanni in Rome a while back and the first intermission didn't hit till about 2 hours and a half into the piece--trust me, that huge theatre wouldn'thave been able to sit still for much longer without a break)
E
Updated On: 6/27/07 at 05:07 AM