I too much prefer the Follies threads to these Into the Woods threads. I mean, these threads are basically like camouflage the way they blend in with each other. Now those Follies ones, THOSE were threads.
But by all means, let's start another thread complaining about those threads. That certainly clears up the board.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
You obviously don't understand. When it comes to Sondheim, there are NEVER enough threads. There are so many layers upon layers upon layers... texts, subtexts, metatexts.... all worthy of- actually demanding- the most minute analysis, generously provided by the professorial types here.
And surely you couldn't expect that the likes of Kad & co. could find a mere 50 posts or so sufficient to convey their deep insights to us all. Why no less than 100, 200, going, going, gone will do.
Except for the "official" review thread -- none of the ITW threads are started by Kad OR Company. (Whoever that is suppose to be.)
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.