Is anybody else tired of the projections-as-scenery trend? — Page 2

>>>The projections in All My Sons (along with that ghastly underscoring)

Amen.

The projections and "music" were, in a word, ghastly.

Ruined the show for me.

philly3: TWIW was panned by critics and closed after three months. i'm glad you liked it and all (and lord knows i have a "contrarian" list of my own favs), but certainly the show deserves to be included in any discussion of over-used projections.

btw, intersting that you mentioned the moving walls ... i thought the speed at which they moved gave the show an unnaturally frenetic pace, which also detracted from the overall production. those things were flying across the stage like pinballs; in fact, my mother got a little motion sick at one point!

chacon a son gout!

---

whatever2: I do know WOman in White got panned and was pretty ravished by the critics (but it did open in the months surrounding Sweeney Todd & Jersey Boys!), but I still enjoyed it. And the Tony Comittee/voters liked it enough to nominate it for Best Score! (Which I don't think was by default)

It was slightly sickening to watch it, but it did look incredible. The waterfall, the houses, the fields...And it was pretty awesome with the doors opening and the revolve and then they were in the next room...yet I do see a huge downfall in Trevor Nunn's what I would call lazy directing (Not that I am even a fan of his).

And WiW should be included in all projection-scenery discussions considering it was truly what I would describe as the first production to rely entirely on projections. (As I said before - Jane Eyre definitely sparked the idea for these idea (both John Caird and Trevor Nunn are responsible for requesteing that's how it be done), but JE's was more of additional scenery from what I recall...!).

ya when i saw Spamalot in Chicago I didnt like it that much because of all the pojections that were used. got annoying after a while

No.

---

I do agree that there are some points where it is completely unnecessary, but I must say: I just got back from Distracted and this is one play where the projections worked brilliantly. Although I do get your point that it makes certain seats have a horrendously partial view, from where I sat it was perfect. Not only did it add so much to the entire spirit/theme of the production (constant distractions and anxieties), but I just thought it was done so damn WELL. Everything from the booming television suddenly coming on to the projections of George W. Bush during Nixon's readings from the DSM-IV criteria for ADD (and suggesting that Bush clearly suffers from it), to the constantly changing scenery - it was all just so magnificent. It also helped that this is a very modern play, right down to the mentioning of the peanut butter scare and the man suing his wife for his kidney back. For productions like All My Sons and Sunday (no matter how beautifully it may have been done for the latter), I just feel it gives a classical play a sometimes unnecessary futuristic touch. Just my two cents though.

Oh, and slightly more on that tangent: I absolutely loved Distracted and suggest it so very highly. I'm not really the type of person who LOVES straight plays (much more a musical person), and although I enjoyed speed-the-plow I think it was more just my utter awe at seeing these three actors I hold in such differing amounts of high regard (Macy from film, Esparza from the stage, and even Moss from TV) than really loving the material itself (though I do love me some Mamet). But with this, while I did enjoy seeing Nixon so much, I actually think I fell in love with the material even more. Again, just my dime's worth.

EDITED TO ADD: Oooh and another time it worked WONDERS was with Billy Elliot. Very minimally, but I felt it really did add so much to the piece, especially since it wasn't pretending to be the set or a character or anything more than just a bit of film showing us the history of the piece. :)

Updated On: 2/18/09 at 01:47 AM