#1
Posted: 10/2/05 at 3:28am
One of the student theatre groups here just put on Urinetown and I caught their final performance tonight. They tried to stay true to its Fringe roots - smaller space, minimal sets/props, etc. I won't review the cast so much since it's people nobody knows, but as it was my first time seeing the show (and hearing the music) it's the only version I can review.
I thought it was a fantastic and enjoyable show, but honestly I don't see how it could have worked on Broadway (and I suppose some would argue that it in fact didn't) - maybe because I'm only used to seeing it with a small ensemble (about 15) in a smaller space, but it just didn't seem like it would be able to translate to a large-scale theater. It reminded me of people lamenting that Trailer Park's set has become too big since its days at the Fringe.
I couldn't help but think Sondheim in quite a few of the numbers as well as some of the dialogue in terms of clever, fast-paced, almost impossible to follow lyrics. Clearly worthy of the Tonys it won, but at the same time unworthy of the Tonys it did not win, particularly best musical. I don't know, for some reason the show as a whole seemed sub-par - not this particular production, just the show in general - I can usually tell if I'd like a show even if I don't enjoy a particular performance, so I can't fault this particular cast/orchestra/crew etc.
Regardless, I'm glad I got to see a production as I'd always wanted to see the show and never got the opportunity to see it in NY. I can totally picture Hunter Foster playing Bobby Strong and the guy who played it tonight was excellent, as was the rest of the cast. It's really one of those shows where you can totally play the characters over-the-top without detracting from, and perhaps even adding to the enjoyment factor. The show-stealer had to be Little Sally - what a great role and fun part to play.
It's definitely a show where the director can pretty much do whatever he wants as far as sets/blocking without doing any damage to the book, and a show I would both see again and recommend to others.
I thought it was a fantastic and enjoyable show, but honestly I don't see how it could have worked on Broadway (and I suppose some would argue that it in fact didn't) - maybe because I'm only used to seeing it with a small ensemble (about 15) in a smaller space, but it just didn't seem like it would be able to translate to a large-scale theater. It reminded me of people lamenting that Trailer Park's set has become too big since its days at the Fringe.
I couldn't help but think Sondheim in quite a few of the numbers as well as some of the dialogue in terms of clever, fast-paced, almost impossible to follow lyrics. Clearly worthy of the Tonys it won, but at the same time unworthy of the Tonys it did not win, particularly best musical. I don't know, for some reason the show as a whole seemed sub-par - not this particular production, just the show in general - I can usually tell if I'd like a show even if I don't enjoy a particular performance, so I can't fault this particular cast/orchestra/crew etc.
Regardless, I'm glad I got to see a production as I'd always wanted to see the show and never got the opportunity to see it in NY. I can totally picture Hunter Foster playing Bobby Strong and the guy who played it tonight was excellent, as was the rest of the cast. It's really one of those shows where you can totally play the characters over-the-top without detracting from, and perhaps even adding to the enjoyment factor. The show-stealer had to be Little Sally - what a great role and fun part to play.
It's definitely a show where the director can pretty much do whatever he wants as far as sets/blocking without doing any damage to the book, and a show I would both see again and recommend to others.
If I lay here
If I just lay here
Would you lie with me and just forget the world?
If I just lay here
Would you lie with me and just forget the world?
Updated On: 10/2/05 at 03:28 AM