Posted: 4/11/15 at 9:01pm
I appreciate the correction, Goth. LOL.
One other concession: I should have said VALENTIN's point (initially) is that escapism = fascism. Obviously, Puig thinks "goodness" AND "beauty" (in Greek terms, good is defined by actions not intentions) have their respective values.
Otherwise, Fantod and Eric, I admit I am speaking in broad terms because this is a message board and I'm already criticized for being too verbose. (Hence, my more egregious claim in a previous post that something was both "acute" and "ambiguous". One of you should have called me on that, I think!) The point is not whether Valentin and Molina actually achieve penetration; the point is each loves the other in his own way. That is more important (to me) than a woman (even the fabulous Miss Rivera) climbing the netting.
I am also speaking from memory about a show I saw 20 years ago. Although I have reviewed the OBCR recently, I don't find it specific enough to be much help.
Alas, Fantod, being gay is not an automatic cure for homophobia. We gays grow up in the same society as non-gays. Also, I'm not talking about conscious intent so much as unconscious result.
Yes, Eric, I usually assign more blame to McNally because many of his other works express similar attitudes. But I have recently reread COLORED LIGHTS in which Kander and Ebb profess their disinterest in "politics". Quite the pair of Molinas in search of a Valentin. (And I disagree: despite the miscasting of Hurt, I think the film does a better job of dramatizing the pair than the musical, thanks to Julia.) With the possible exception of POTO, I think it's safe to assume Prince is always the muscle on a Prince show.
Updated On: 4/11/15 at 09:01 PM
