tracker
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
Home For You Chat My Shows (beta) Register/Login Games Grosses
pixeltracker

Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)

Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)

Alex Kulak2
#1Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)
Posted: 10/10/16 at 4:47pm

I made the previous post about large vs. small casts, and I feel I need to clarify. I wasn't wondering if you definitively prefer shows with large or small casts, regardless of whether the cast size is appropriate. I was wondering if you generally like shows with small casts or large casts better. 

Call_me_jorge Profile Photo
Call_me_jorge
#2Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)
Posted: 10/10/16 at 4:49pm

Broadwayrox said it best. A large show with a small cast and a Small cast in large show would not work. 


My father (AIDS) My sister (AIDS) My uncle and my cousin and her best friend (AIDS, AIDS, AIDS) The gays and the straights And the white and the spades
Updated On: 10/10/16 at 04:49 PM

MinnieFay
#3Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)
Posted: 10/10/16 at 5:01pm

Alex Kulak2 said: "I made the previous post about large vs. small casts, and I feel I need to clarify. I wasn't wondering if you definitively prefer shows with large or small casts, regardless of whether the cast size is appropriate. I was wondering if you generally like shows with small casts or large casts better. "

You can "rephrase" the question as many different ways as you like -- you're going to keep getting the same answer.  It depends on the show!!

dramamama611 Profile Photo
dramamama611
#4Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)
Posted: 10/10/16 at 5:09pm

We understood what you said, the answer is the same: it doesn't matter  A well -directed, acted & written show is going to make me happy regardless of the size of the cast.


If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.

GavestonPS Profile Photo
GavestonPS
#5Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)
Posted: 10/10/16 at 7:27pm

Yes, of course, it may depend on the show. But we've seen a lot of good work lately where large shows were re-conceived as small-cast shows. (And Equity Library Theatre did this successfully for years with small cast versions of shows such as FOLLIES.)

Other examples include revivals of SWEENEY TODD (the "Teeny" TODD and the version where the cast played the instruments). I worked on a winter stock production of SHOW BOAT with 12 instruments in the pit (carefully miked with the musicians doubling) and thoughtful use of a scrim behind which the smaller-than-usual white and black choruses could join together to create the illusion of a crowd; Donald Driver was the director and his production was excellent.

What seems to work less often is when an inherently smallish show is blown up to achieve the spectacle of a big show. E.g., productions of DAMES AT SEA with 40 people on stage.

Can anyone point to an example of the latter (a small show made big, not necessarily DAMES AT SEA) that worked?

Updated On: 10/10/16 at 07:27 PM

Alex Kulak2
#6Large Casts vs. Small? (NEW VERSION)
Posted: 10/10/16 at 8:12pm

I've seen middle school productions of Spelling Bee where, rather than participants being called from the audience, it was an ensemble of nameless students in the back.


Videos