#26
Posted: 4/16/11 at 9:49pm
"To be honest, the vast majority of people (with a few small exceptions) that end up going for MFA's are people whose careers have been stagnant or nonexistent after undergrad, and an MFA is an attempt to try to counteract that."
dexter3, I understand where you are coming from, but as someone with an MFA in Acting, please let me provide an alternative, insider's perspective for readers of this thread.
The MFA's both at the conservatory where I got my degree and at the state school where I went to undergrad were all there for different reasons and had different levels of professional experience.
Most MFA Acting students, from my obervation, are usually somewhere in their twenties, but there are occassionally a couple of people in their thirties or even forties. Some had come directly from undergrad, some (like me) had been out for only one or two years, and some--the older ones--of course had been out for many years. And yes, those who had several years of professional experience probably were trying to re-energize their careers by attempting to get better with additional training. I would have to agree that if you already have a fair amount of training (i.e. a BFA), you're near or over thirty, and you still aren't getting much work as an actor, an MFA probably isn't going to help you much at this point (although you never know). To be honest, I did find those students to be a little bit depressing, except for the ones who were getting MFA's specifically so they could become theater professors.
But in actuality, the older people made up the MINORITY of MFA students. Most MFA acting students are in their early to mid-twenties, have not been out in the field long (if at all), and simply want more (or better) training before tackling the industry at full force. And a couple of the older students were actually relatively new to acting. They did not receive undegraduate degrees in acting and had never attempted acting careers. They had always loved theater and had done a couple plays in college or whatever but had had normal jobs and lives until they (perhas somewhat randomly) decided to go for an acting career. And surprisingly, those students were some of the best of the bunch.
So please, MFA's are not just for failed actors trying to jumpstart their careers or become teachers. As I said, most MFA students have barely even started their careers, if at all. I encourage anyone who is young and eager for a career but feels inadequately prepared to go for an MFA in Acting. The same goes for people who want an MFA or MM in Musical Theatre.
Everyone please feel free to PM me with any questions you might on the subject.
dexter3, I understand where you are coming from, but as someone with an MFA in Acting, please let me provide an alternative, insider's perspective for readers of this thread.
The MFA's both at the conservatory where I got my degree and at the state school where I went to undergrad were all there for different reasons and had different levels of professional experience.
Most MFA Acting students, from my obervation, are usually somewhere in their twenties, but there are occassionally a couple of people in their thirties or even forties. Some had come directly from undergrad, some (like me) had been out for only one or two years, and some--the older ones--of course had been out for many years. And yes, those who had several years of professional experience probably were trying to re-energize their careers by attempting to get better with additional training. I would have to agree that if you already have a fair amount of training (i.e. a BFA), you're near or over thirty, and you still aren't getting much work as an actor, an MFA probably isn't going to help you much at this point (although you never know). To be honest, I did find those students to be a little bit depressing, except for the ones who were getting MFA's specifically so they could become theater professors.
But in actuality, the older people made up the MINORITY of MFA students. Most MFA acting students are in their early to mid-twenties, have not been out in the field long (if at all), and simply want more (or better) training before tackling the industry at full force. And a couple of the older students were actually relatively new to acting. They did not receive undegraduate degrees in acting and had never attempted acting careers. They had always loved theater and had done a couple plays in college or whatever but had had normal jobs and lives until they (perhas somewhat randomly) decided to go for an acting career. And surprisingly, those students were some of the best of the bunch.
So please, MFA's are not just for failed actors trying to jumpstart their careers or become teachers. As I said, most MFA students have barely even started their careers, if at all. I encourage anyone who is young and eager for a career but feels inadequately prepared to go for an MFA in Acting. The same goes for people who want an MFA or MM in Musical Theatre.
Everyone please feel free to PM me with any questions you might on the subject.