"Cruel Sandwhich"?
Never heard of the name.
Two points and then I'm done:
"Mamma Mia!" has already carved a noteworthy mark in film history by dropping "Hairspray" from the #1 spot in terms of opening box office revenues. It more than likely will break a few other records along the way. Will it be "Citizen Cane"? No. But it will establish a few noteworthy records before it's relegated to the sale bins at Blockbuster.
I could have just as easily restated the obvious: the film is not nearly the disaster many have suggested it is and there has been far worse singing in movies by actors than that of Pierce's.
My second point: I admit I should not have used my own experiences in a hyperbolic manner to talk about discussions of "Ishtar" in cafe's around the world (although as someone who flies for an airline, there have been a lot o such conversations I instigated in such places).
I would be willing to concede that I can speak with no more authority on the scope of "Ishtar"'s fascination among film-buffs globally than the authority of the guy who used hyperbole to make an over-the-top statement about Brosnan's singing being similar to the utterances the actor would make when being given a DRE.
I'm assuming the guy is not an M.D., nor has he witnesed enough such exams to
speculate how anyone, much less Brosnan, would respond to one vocally.
I only point this out to state the obvious: most of of us employ embellishment to make a point and the embellishments are considered as such and regarded benignly
as poetic license.
If one wants to really examine the issue (no pun intended) I think I could make a more compelling case that I have participated in (and overheard more) discussions about "Ishtar" abroad (particularly in 1987 after the film's release) than this guy has
had concerning a-list actors getting prostate exams.
Updated On: 7/24/08 at 03:14 PM