i certainly agree that there needs to be a legit stage actor, but i would prefer one that actually has a baritone voice and more of a range. i would really hate for him to mess up sweeney the way he did my other favourite sondheim shows (passion @ the kennedy center, and assassins). pooryorick, i think you'd like assassins better if you saw/heard it with a different cast. it needs to be more subdued than mantello's production. i remember walking into the theatre and seeing t-shirts that said "everybody's got the right." i think that kind of summerizes that production, right there. also, i have to beg to differ (again) about raul. maybe it's my taboo-lovin that's blinding me, but i thought he was extroidanary in the role of philip. how can you agrue with the notes he hits in "freak" "petrified" and "sexual confusion"? of course, reaching difficult notes isn't the only criteria for a tony award, his actual acting was quite multi-layered. again, i am a taboo-freak, so you can take my opinion for what it's worth

george hearn, if he is not *too* old, would be a fine choice. but since it's such a "revision" of the show, i suposse they should pick someone that we're not used to seeing play the role. no imediate names come to mind... perhaps mr. priest will have ideas for us, since he's all mr. sweeney.