Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
RentBoy86
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
#25re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 3:10pmWell Jersey Boys seems to be different. The songs are put in there for dramaitc purpose, correct? I've never seen the show, but I have the OBC and so I thought all the songs were moreso "performed" by the band in the show rather than use to develop character.
MargoChanning
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/5/04
#26re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 3:33pm
JEROME ROBBINS BROADWAY doesn't really fit into any of these categories (though if pressed, I suppose I would call it a revue). It wasn't just a randomly assembled collection of dances. Robbins fully restaged certain classic moments from the shows he was famous for, using the original costume and set designs and included the dialogue scenes that led into those moments to give them their proper context. Even if you didn't know or had never seen or heard PETER PAN, KING AND I, WEST SIDE STORY, FIDDLER, ON THE TOWN, HIGH BUTTON SHOES, FORUM, GYPSY etc... Robbins gave you enough lead in for each scene so that you truly got a sense of how each scene worked in the original show. It's also why he didn't simply hire great dancers, but also prominently featured performers like Jason Alexander, Faith Prince, and Debbie Shapiro (now Gravitte) who were known for their acting, singing and comedic abilities and not for their dancing (none of them did much if any dancing in the show).
Truly an extraordinary even of theatre with one showstopper after another. Too bad it wasn't filmed for PBS or some other outlet (most likely because the licensing and rights fees would have been astronomical for such high profile shows).
#27re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 3:37pm
What is happening to Broadway? New musicals are stinking up this season - BIG time. Hopefully Drowsy will be well received by the critics.
Some new musicals seem to be so dissapointing and crappy lately.
Thankfully for the revivals this season. And next season, will have some killer revials too.
#28re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 3:41pmWith two big musical belly flops in a row (LESTAT and HOT FEET), I can't imagine that critic's won't look at DROWSY as a saving grace, at this point. Of course, after DROWSY we're back to flops, as TARZAN opens.
RentBoy86
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
#29re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 3:47pmWho knows, critics may be astounded by the technical aspects of Tarzan. Though I'm sure like any other Disney show, they'll praise the visual aspect, but tear apart the book and music. Did critics praise Lion King for its book and score? I thought the score/book was horrible.
#30re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 3:53pmindeed, TLK was awful, still a hit though.
#31re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 4:40pmI do think that many critics were impressed with taymor's design and direction, regardless of how they liked the show.
#32re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 4:40pmI do think that many critics were impressed with taymor's design and direction, regardless of how they liked the show.
#33re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 4:45pmTHE LION KING is far from bad. Well, when it first opened, it was far from bad. Still, it's aesthetic achievements are above and beyond that of anything else Disney has done, especially TARZAN.
RentBoy86
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
#34re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 6:46pmWell yeah, I would agree with that. Design wise it was amazing, but it left me feeling empty. I dunno, I think it was just the horrible acting and the really bland book. I'm sure Tarzan will at least have a lenghty run because of its presale and its marketability.
#35re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 6:48pmi agree.
Hawker
Featured Actor Joined: 2/23/04
#36re: Munk's opening night HOT FEET review
Posted: 5/1/06 at 8:15pm
The idea of the definition of a "Jukebox Musical" being primarily a piece that incorporates previously recorded music from a single source is too vague and all encompassing.
One could argue that the music from "Contact" which featured that of Bobby Darin, Benny goodman, and Robert Palmer could be found in jukeboxes and "Contact" was far from such an entity. I believe it is more accurate to describe a "jukebox" musical as one in which a book is contrived in order to allow for songs to be incoroporated into a show.
Thus, you have such bizarre scenes as that in Mamma Mia where "Dancing Girl" emerges from action so thin you could slip it under a door.
Contrast that with "Sherry" from "Jersey Boys" which is heard 40 minutes into the show and only after a prolonged setup or "Can't Take My Eyes off of You" which is almost the eleven o'clock number and it has been demonstrated drmatically and through exposition how the thing made it to the public.
"Jersey Boys" is clearly not a "Jukebox Musical". It's much more similar to "The Commitments" than a "Jukebox Movie" like "A Hard Day's Night".
Videos

