NY Times RAVE review for Idina Menzel at Radio City

[getlucky2]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 11:00am

The haters remain pressed and obsessed. *giggle*

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/arts/music/idina-menzel-at-radio-city-music-hall.html

[Liza's Headband]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 11:19am

how much $$ does Idina's team pay you? do they pay you by the word..? by the post...? by the thread..?

[getlucky2]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 12:00pm

"how much $$ does Idina's team pay you? do they pay you by the word..? by the post...? by the thread..?"

As much $$ as you're paid to be the satan's spawn of this forum spewing your venom and negativity where its not welcome. Stay lonely and unemployed.

[YouWantitWhen????]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 12:03pm

Funny, I thought the accessory did it for free.

[Mister Matt]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 12:11pm

It's not like getlucky2 wrote the NYT review. I dare say this isn't the first time a positive review has been posted on BWW.

[fingerlakessinger]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 12:17pm

I fail to see how posting a positive review about someone means they are working for that persons team. I guess most of Broadwayworld works for someone.

[dtzumbrunnen]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 12:58pm

Interesting use of the term "1-2 punch," NY Times. I don't think two smash hits that are 10 years apart quite qualifies, no matter how good they are.

[Liza's Headband]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 1:33pm

fingerlakes. If you look at getlucky's history, he/she only posts about Idina and it's only gushing or overly positive. That's top notch shilling.

[haterobics]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 1:36pm

Which is the more egregious part: the positivity or the singular focus?

[Mister Matt]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 1:36pm

So, basically you're here to police the Idina posts and sh*t on them? In what way is that superior to someone who posts positive remarks?

[tazber]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 1:45pm

Well, when someone starts a thread taunting the so called "haters" for no reason it does come off rather obnoxious.

Why not just start a thread about the concert without calling out these mysterious haters?
This makes you look immature and annoying.

Updated On: 6/17/14 at 01:45 PM

[haterobics]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 1:49pm

It seems a bit naive to think that, without that line, all of the Idina haters who for some reason are entering a thread called "NY Times RAVE review for Idina Menzel at Radio City" wouldn't have written anything negative had they not been taunted.

[Mister Matt]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 2:04pm

Why not just start a thread about the concert without calling out these mysterious haters?
This makes you look immature and annoying.

Oh, now that part I agree with. But it is sorta funny to see who so quickly took the bait and responded precisely as expected.

[SonofRobbieJ]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 2:11pm

'If you look at getlucky's history, he/she only posts about Idina and it's only gushing or overly positive.'

You should consider yourself very lucky to have missed half of 2003 and most of 2004 'round these here parts.

[ShakinBaconGirl]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 2:36pm

The only person hating is The Headband and that thing is a stalker troll so no surprise there. Why is it still here?

[Liza's Headband]

Posted: 6/17/14 at 2:43pm

"You should consider yourself very lucky to have missed half of 2003 and most of 2004 'round these here parts."

Bless you, Robbie, for some perspective. A point well taken.