"JustaGuy-not sure if you heard but at these meetings the two sides were sitting down with 'spreadsheets open' as reported in NY1. So I believe they were both saying here's what its going to cost us both to make these changes. to your point about subsidiary rights, concessions etc, what does that have to do with how much a stage hand gets paid for his job, or how many stage hands should be hired to do any one particular job (the main points of contention in the negotiations)? You are mixing the wrong ingredients into your argument. Furthermore, why should stage hands or any other worker who is not a box office draw benefit more when a show or shows is profitable. By that argument, they should also suffer pay cuts when shows are losing money."
BillyNJ was speaking of transparency in the negotiations, wanting the Union to reveal publicly what they were asking for without, asking the same of the League.
Having open spreadsheets in a private negotiation, is not the same as having open spreadsheets that are available to the public. I was pointing out what is good for the goose is good for the gander. He wants the Union to put everything out to the public with out asking for the League to do the same. The League has intimated that it's the Unions that are eating away at the profits, as if they were the only cause for unprofitable production and if the Unions would just lower their pay-scales all would be right with the world. When in fact Union salaries and benefits are only a small, percentage of the total costs of mounting and running a production.
I did not mention anything about profit sharing. So you're trying to add a few ingredients of your own.
"Just a Guy. Your feelings are touching. I am gladdened by the thought that you will one day wind up 6 feet under as we all do." - MrRoxy ------
"I do not suggest you walk out the door onto a New York street with your vulnerable child part exposed and not protected..." - Jason Bennett