"LOL OKAY Islander.
1. Wiki is a reliable source
2. I do have insider sources
3. In another thread you tried telling me off, and said i was wrong when I said that someone told me that The King and I can only run for a certain amount of time cause its not for profit. Oh and guess what, you were WRONG!"
As someone who is a teacher and friends with other teachers (mostly middle and high school, one elementary and one who's finishing up his doctorate to be a professor) I can tell you that no teacher accepts wikipedia as a reliable source. The main reason being is that in the world of academia Wikipedia's a joke because anyone can edit it. Hell, you can be doing a research paper on Shakespeare and find and put in your paper that he was raised in the money house of the Bronx Zoo. That's why wikipeida is a joke in the world of academia.
And, you said, with regards to King and I, that it can only run a given length of time before it has to close. Not the case, it was proven otherwise by a third party and you were wrong. Yet again, another example of you mincing words to get the end result that fits what you like the most.
With regards to having "inside dope" to anything Broadway related? well I have doubts about that. But, it's not whether or not that is the issue, it's the simple fact that if you do, you go about it in such a dickish fashion. You insist that you can't be wrong, after all, if information that you post is wrong it's not your fault, but rather the fault of the person who gave it to you. When you give wrong information, don't throw this "other person" under the bus. Grow a pair and admit that it was you, and only you who was wrong because you are the one that posted any info. Not your friend.