#51
Posted: 5/13/13 at 12:21am
Here's how I know the book was not slight. In 1937, they mounted the show in London, in a marvelous production with Vera Zorina in her first big role and Jack Whiting, an excellent song-and-dance juvenile in the lead role. The producers EXACTLY copied the original production. And it flopped. It played 72 performances. Why? The London critics LOVED the show. They realized how much of an advancement in musical theatre this show represented. The London audiences just plain could not understand it. They had to think FAR too hard to follow the plot. Compare this show to anything by Charles Cochrane (the David Merrick of London) and you'll see why the auds, who were used to revues and slight shows about princes in Ruritaria were puzzled.
By today's standards, it MIGHT be called slight, but in the 1930s, plays and movies WERE often slight. On Your Toes had some meat on the bones, and coupled with Ray Bolger at the height of his prowess, a swell score and George Balanchine's choreography, I'll bet it was one hell of a swelligant night.
By today's standards, it MIGHT be called slight, but in the 1930s, plays and movies WERE often slight. On Your Toes had some meat on the bones, and coupled with Ray Bolger at the height of his prowess, a swell score and George Balanchine's choreography, I'll bet it was one hell of a swelligant night.
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=972787#3631451
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=963561#3533883
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=955158#3440952
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=954269#3427915
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=955012#3441622
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=954344#3428699
Updated On: 5/13/13 at 12:21 AM
