I don't agree the music is slight. I also don't agree that the dance numbers had little to do with the story. That's just wrong. For 1936, this was a very forward-looking show. It was written in 1935 as a movie for Fred Astaire by Rodgers and Hart while they were under contract in Hollywood and he turned it down, saying he couldn't do the ballet numbers(which is why there is no Rogers and Hart Fred and Ginger movie.) Dick and Larry reworked it as a stage show and came to New York, looking for a backer. They played the show for the Shuberts, but Lee fell asleep during Princess Zenobia, so they left in disgust. On the street, they ran into Dwight Deere Wyman, a wealthy playboy who backed Broadway shows (including, ironically, Astaire's last show Gay Divorce). He readily agreed to do any show by Rodgers and Hart, and for his efforts, ended up getting ALL of the rest of their shows right up until Larry died. (edit, Except Pal Joey).
Back to the music and dance. How can you call the music in a show slight when it has "There's a Small Hotel," one of the most recorded songs in history and "Slaughter on Tenth Avenue" which has been performed by every major orchestra you can name? Frankly, I think it is perhaps the most eerily evocative score I have ever heard. From the overture to Slaughter, no other show simply reeks of the 1930s, the depression, the New Deal, jazz, big band like On Your Toes. Then there's Hart's great lyrics, which he apparently tossed off on the backs of napkins and unpaid bills. Certainly, "I was made on lemonade" is clever, but for my money, a few verses down, "I've fallen twice with two at once" is a masterpiece of phrasing. It's so effortless and simple, but try writing something that clever and facile; it's enough to drive a man to dr... oh, wait a minute.....
As for the ballets, under Balanchine's watchful eye, both ballets were very significant in the development of Broadway musical theatre. Princess Zenobia was an utterly ridiculous satire on Russian ballet, which was all the pompous rage in the 20s and 30s, and the fact that Giorgi Melitonovitch Balanchivadze, a Russian choreographer, chose to poke such sly fun at the hand and feet that fed him was pretty daring. Nobody dared do that back then. Slaughter was a different beast altogether. Balanchine was trying to tell a story through dance inside the ballet, while Rodgers and Hart were using the number to present the culmination of their entire musical's plot on the outside of the ballet. That was very complex staging for 1936 audiences that were used to lavish reviews and chock full 'o girls musicals starring Eddie Cantor and Al Jolson, or stand-in-a-line and sing operettas.
This show was, literally, a decade ahead of its time.
(One final self-serving note: if you haven't done so before, try one of my links listed below to treasure troves of old Broadway stuff.)
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=972787#3631451
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=963561#3533883
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=955158#3440952
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=954269#3427915
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=955012#3441622
http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.cfm?thread=954344#3428699
Updated On: 5/11/13 at 12:41 AM