Overrated Performers — Page 7
Posted: 2/17/05 at 10:21pm
With friends like these...
Look, I'm all for being critical about productions and actors' performances in such. It's how we develop as artists...analyzing what works and what doesn't. And I understand the passion with which people argue here.
But SOME of the responses here are just filled with such bile. I only hope that, after working a lifetime to achieve a modicum of success, you are met with nothing but appreciation (and constructive criticism).
Posted: 2/18/05 at 2:09pm
But as for the bile -- yes, we should all temper our criticism with some respect.
Having said that, Sarah Brightman -- WAY overrated. Her acting never impressed me (but I don't think she ever really professed to be much of an actress) and her high notes make my skin crawl. She has a tendency to close her throat too much on those notes and it produces this thin, sometimes tinny sound that I just can't listen to without feeling really uncomfortable. But hey -- other people just love her.
Another overrated performer would be Idina -- I'll join in that one. She's good and I like her, but she's not quite as amazing as to the extent that people have said. And I lump Sutton Foster into that category, as well. Saw Little Women and although I generally thought she did a fair job, she overacted the part of Jo (felt like I was watching Carol Burnett), and her singing needs some work (those higher notes that she tried to belt out were totally strained during both parts of "Astonishing").
Finally, Bebe Neuwirth -- I'll never understand why some people think she's so great.
Posted: 2/18/05 at 2:15pm
:: Clouseau Blog ::
Posted: 2/18/05 at 2:15pm
Posted: 2/18/05 at 2:20pm
It's not her fault the script falls flat and the songs don't go anywhere...
Posted: 2/18/05 at 2:23pm
Posted: 2/18/05 at 2:27pm
Updated On: 2/18/05 at 02:27 PM
Posted: 2/18/05 at 2:40pm
Posted: 2/18/05 at 5:08pm
What's funny is that we usually show no compunction in criticizing a score or a book that can be attributed to one person. Maybe because it's more indirect- you're not insulting the person, just their work in this particular instance.
Another thing that may contribute to the relatively "nice" way we treat actors? Tons of people on this board are aspiring, former, or working actors themselves. I doubt there's as many composers and set designers around here.
Posted: 2/18/05 at 5:36pm
Just as an example, a dear friend of mine is an absolutely brilliant playwrite, and although her plays have received much critical acclaim, she has had to endure the occasional slams by reviewers and audience members. And she is, indeed, incredibly hurt by the criticism (even though we all counsel her that there is no bad publicity) because she gives her life blood to these works, and she feels incredibly vulnerable as a result.
But I don't mean to wax philosophical here (nor do I wish to thread-jack -- this is a great thread, by the way, baddadnpa). Just thought I'd mention that I found it interesting that we tend to be less sensitive to other creative people in the industry. But then, that's why some of us are accused of being divas (no, not me, ever!).
Posted: 2/18/05 at 5:37pm
Posted: 2/18/05 at 5:41pm
opinions on a persons performance is subjective and therefore is much more valuable when stated without the "bile" (great way to put it!) and with reasons to back up the critic. Too many times on this board I read useless, and really just plain mean comments. People think they are being witty I guess, but it's not useful. I'd rather see a harsh, yet true felt review than one that just says "I hated it" or "I loved it"
It would be nice if people could say what they have to say nicely. It really can be done and the other just hurts peoples'feelings and puts them on the defensive rather than really listening to what is being said.
Posted: 2/18/05 at 10:02pm
Posted: 2/18/05 at 10:41pm
Posted: 2/21/05 at 4:07am
No other star has had that kind of career.
But her very broad acting style was rooted in the 1930s when performers played up to the audiences. Still it might have been fun to see her play Mrs Lovett! (she reportedly refused to go and see SWEENEY TODD.)
When I staretd in radio in 1979 we did a couple of interviews with her and she was remarkably candid and down to earth. Best line..we mentioned many of her hit shows and asked what had been some of her disappointments, thinking she might have said HAPPY HUNTING providing a good segue into that show. her response was "Marriages. But we all make mistakes, and thats what I did. I made a few Looloos!" It was great Ethel Merman response.
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com
Posted: 2/21/05 at 4:11am
Posted: 2/21/05 at 4:58am
Posted: 2/21/05 at 11:00am
Posted: 2/21/05 at 11:32am
He has quite an undeniable stage presence too.
Pretty darn great in Millie I thought...no?
Posted: 2/23/05 at 2:04am
Posted: 2/25/05 at 7:36pm
Posted: 2/25/05 at 8:30pm
I haven't been around long enough or watched shows multiple times so I can't really say who's overrated or not.
Though just from a gut instinct I do get the vibe that Chenoweth is a tad bit fake. Overrated...no. High C's for eight beats...you try that!
Posted: 2/25/05 at 8:39pm
Posted: 2/25/05 at 8:47pm
Maybe we can't exactly put chopped liver on stage...Drew Lachey is a good example of that. :rollseyes:
BroadwayWorld TV