I am thrilled for Ms. LuPone.....I too have seen her in the concert dvd and would love to see a "different" performance, just for the sake of the difference. I was excited about Lauper. Patti LuPone does seem to be able to use a bit of help in the dialect department. I suspect we will see a richer and deeper performance of Mrs. Lovett from Patti Lupone than she was able to provide in time for that dvd'd concert version. :)
"Blow out the candles Robert and make a wish. Want something, want SOMETHING."
LuPone is one of the greatest talents any of us will see in our lifetimes. Sometimes self-destructrive, like other divas, but when she is fully engaged, there's no one as powerful.
She will rise to the occasion and give the level of performance she would have given in Gypsy if the evil old queen Arthur Laurents hadn't petulantly decreed that she would only play it over his dead withered body.
Thank GOD he and Sondheim aren't speaking any longer. Maybe this news will finally drive a steak through his vampiric heart.
Oh no. Love Sweeney, don't exactly love LuPone. I have to admit the only times I've found her tolerable are when she was singing Sondheim, but I wanted more than tolerable from this production. Still...B'way.com has been wrong before, hasn't it?
Yeah. I mean the whole point of this production is that is bizarre, unique, and different from any other production we've seen of SWEENEY on Broadway before.
Casting LuPone, throws all that out the window. Truly, if they are going the route of casting such a traditional "Broadway Star" they should just mount a traditional staging of the show.
ACTUALLY....everyone remain calm. I keep hearing that people want to see her in the different version- and- that now the new take on it isn't going to work- and- maybe we'll see Patti "bump it with a trumpet" (funny) BUT the Roundabout production of Sweeney Todd is DEAD. This is a different production people....
Kid no its not. The Roundabout is no longer producing it, but it is the same production from London that they were initially going to present. Same director. Same concept.
Not my favorite Mrs Lovett, but I did like her portayal much more than I liked Angela Lansubury's. Heck, I'm willing to give it a shot. Different director could mean a different performance.
"This ocean runs more dark and deep than you may think you know...I'll be the fear of the fire at sea."
-Marie Christine
That's what I meant......still I think the image of Cyndi Lauper, which is probably her own personality(which can carry over into her portrayal Mrs. Lovett), would go well with the show!
I just thought she was too over-the-top, even in a over-the-top role. It aggravated me to the point where I avoid watching the OBC DVD (well her and Johanna) No offense, just my opinion.
"This ocean runs more dark and deep than you may think you know...I'll be the fear of the fire at sea."
-Marie Christine
It's over the top because a camera is in her face capturing the performance she's giving in the 2,500 seat Dorothy Chandler Pavilion in Los Angeles. She's playing big in a big theatre, filling the space the way a great stage star is able to do. In person in the original Broadway production, it's the greatest female performance in a musical I've ever seen - with Len Cariou every bit her equal.
I understand that, and agree to some extent. But her character choices were over the top, not just her physicality. I'm not saying she "sucked" by any means. I appreciate listening to her on the CD much more than listening to Lupone, but how she made Mrs. Lovett move was what I don't like. Again, just an opinion.
Hearn was over-the-top but I felt it was the right amount.
"This ocean runs more dark and deep than you may think you know...I'll be the fear of the fire at sea."
-Marie Christine
A lot of what Lansbury is doing is English Music Hall vaudeville, and in fact, some of her physical bits are homages to Tessie O'Shea. I've seen a lot of Lovetts over the years, but no one ever went out on a limb with the mania the way Lansbury did, but still found the lost, lonely woman at the same time AND made you love her and root for her, even at her most avaricious. It's just a genius performance and I can't abide a word said against it.
Thank you, Magruder, for your defense of the remarkable Lansbury in this, easily a defining role of musical theatre. That said, I am THRILLED by the casting of Cerveris and the possibility of LuPone. What I am decidedly NOT thrilled about is this odd, performance art, off-off-off-off-Broadway-sounding staging of Todd. I, personally, hate "concepts" that are slapped onto a show haphazardly in an attempt to be fresh. I am not AT ALL interested in watching two people sing "Ah, Miss" while they sit in chairs playing instruments and stare out at the audience. We're going to miss every real human emotion in favor of attempting something that, I think, just won't serve this piece. Maybe they can do it in a stylized Japanese style, and give every single line delivery a monotone.