Neddy, I don't know if I agree with you. The young adults paying student rush tickets were not the ones who made Spring Awakening a financial success. Spring Awakening became a success first because of the traditional theatre going crowd who came because of the reviews and the strong word of mouth, and then the tourists came because of the Tonys.
Also, I do think that Passing Strange has a hook. It's too bad Stu is not a bigger rock star, but there hasn't been a musical yet where the composer/musician also acts in the piece, narrating his life story. It would be like Duncan Sheik performing in Spring Awakening.
I havn't seen Passing Strange yet, and would love a clearer picture of why people don't think it will work. Is it just because it's an intimate show in a large Broadway house? Is the story/music not satisfying? Is it because an all- African American cast requires more targeted outreach? From what I've heard on their website, the music is the type that won't alienate a Broadway audience, and the story of a quest to find oneself is as universal as Kerouac's "On The Road" or the Wizard of Oz. Can someone clarify?
One of the major reasons why Spring Awakening, another avant garde show, succeeded and this won't is that Spring Awakening was targeting a specific demographic. SA knew that their show would appeal mainly to appeal to teens and young adults and they made sure to target them. They also had a major hook - the entire cast (with the exception of the adults) are all under the age of 21. Passing Strange doesn't have a hook like SA nor do they have a specific demographic that their show will appeal to.
Updated On: 12/29/07 at 03:10 AM