Patti Cohenour as Christine Daae
Posted: 2/11/07 at 5:49pm
http://web.mac.com/patticohenour/iWeb/Patti%20Cohenour/Theater.html
Posted: 2/11/07 at 5:54pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 5:56pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 5:57pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:02pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:02pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:04pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:05pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:15pm

Patti Cohenour was the first Christine Daae and the best their was that I have seen.
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:18pm
Well I would assume that the Really Useful Group thought that they were.
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:25pm
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:28pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:28pm
The...first?
Most of the women who have played the role on Broadway were over 40.
I don't know if it's most, but certainly many over the years around the world have been over 40. I'm guessing most have been in their 30s or very late 20s. You won't usually see someone in their early 20s, much less late teens--I believe there has only been one stage Christine that age (can't recall her name).
I personally believe the character should be about 18 as Emmy Rossum was in the film--it would make much more sense historically and plot-wise--but obviously most of the actual actresses who play the role are older for vocal reasons.
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:30pm
Google Amy Nuttal, Cristin Mortenson, and Julie Hanson.
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:42pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:42pm
Yes, Julie Hanson is in her mid-20s and has been playing the role on and off for years...and doing a great job of it.
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:47pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:49pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 6:50pm
Patti was told that this might be a possibility, but she was pretty devastated. She agreed to stay on as the original "matinee Christine," with a promise that she would take over the evening performances after Sarah returned to the UK. It was not a great experience for her, and Patti opted out of renewing her contract instead... and actually quit the business for a little while at that point. She'd had enough and needed a break.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 2/11/07 at 7:11pm
They wouldn't split it because the actress is being nominated, not the role...it's Sarah's performance, so she would be the only one to win (barring the fact that Sarah Brightman will never, ever even be nominated).
The second question is a little more interesting...I've thought of that before. After all, the alternate Christine is not an understudy/standby/swing, she performs regularly. However, there might be some sort of regulation about how many performances you must do per week, or what percentage of the performances you have to be scheduled for--something like that. In any case, it's a rare situation because Phantom is one of the only shows to use a regular alternate (I believe the only one currently on Broadway).
Posted: 2/11/07 at 7:13pm
Jersey Boys and all shows with little kids.
Posted: 2/11/07 at 7:15pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 7:25pm
Posted: 2/11/07 at 7:39pm
And yes, all the little tykes...silly me. But schedules for children's roles are usually much more evenly divided among the actors than a role like Christine in Phantom is, so it seems like a different situation in terms of who would be considered first for a nomination.
ETA: Rebecca Luker was an ensemble member in the original Broadway cast, not a Christine yet.
And you're all forgetting...Claire Moore was the first alternate/replacement! Original London Cast 4ever lolz!
Updated On: 2/11/07 at 07:39 PM
BroadwayWorld TV