Patti LuPone at Les Mouches on CD! — Page 2
Posted: 8/14/08 at 6:53pm
Posted: 8/14/08 at 8:00pm
LuPone should give really props to Kritzer because the interest in the original show is partly attributable to Kritzer's sold out gigs at Joe's Pub. And Kritzer's record deal got screwed in the process.
That's showbusiness for you. But what goes around, comes around, as they say.
Posted: 8/14/08 at 8:00pm
Updated On: 8/14/08 at 08:00 PM
Posted: 8/14/08 at 8:00pm
Updated On: 8/14/08 at 08:00 PM
Posted: 8/14/08 at 8:13pm
It's PATTI LUPONE'S show. Quite frankly she could do whatever she wants with/about it.
Updated On: 8/14/08 at 08:13 PM
Posted: 8/14/08 at 8:33pm
what would you do if someone did something like this with Liza With a Z?
Posted: 8/14/08 at 8:45pm
Posted: 8/14/08 at 9:01pm
If Krtizer can have LuPone and Wainwright can have Judy, I can have Liza.
Posted: 8/14/08 at 9:02pm
sweet, that's like the Pope telling me I'm going to Heaven.
Posted: 8/14/08 at 10:10pm
It was awesome. - theaterkid1015
Posted: 8/14/08 at 11:14pm
A hilarious and true statement from the Sh-k-boom website in response to the news.
According to theatermania, the CD will be released November 11th.
http://www.theatermania.com/content/news.cfm/story/14910
Updated On: 8/14/08 at 11:14 PM
Posted: 8/14/08 at 11:44pm
Everyone knows that Leslie Kritzer only proceeded with her show with LuPone's blessing, and Kritzer would not have done it without LuPone green lighting it.
When the opportunity for Leslie Kritzer to record and release a CD of Patti LuPone material presented itself, LuPone realized that there was money to be made out of the commercial success of Kritzer's show, and LuPone seized that opportunity to make money for herself even though Kritzer worked her ass off and rightly deserved her own LESLIE KRITZER AS PATTI LUPONE AT LES MOUCHES CD.
Essentially, Kritzer was screwed royally because after all was said and done, only LuPone's CD could be released, and Kritzer's was to be shelved.
Yes, LuPone could do as she damn well pleases with her own material. But even the copyright laws provide that Leslie Kritzer's own show stands on its own and does not likely constitute an infringement of any sort. Hence, the LuPone and Kritzer CDs could have been released separate and apart from each other or as companion pieces. One didn't have to be tossed aside in favor of the other.
LuPone too was once an aspiring, rising actress-singer. It just leaves such a bad taste in the mouth that LuPone, whom Kritzer admires and adores, ruined Kritzer's chances to have a CD of hers released. Not to mention a letdown to Kritzer's fans who enjoyed her Joe's Pub appearances tremendously.
LuPone has not earned her difficult reputation for nothing. And karma is a bitch, so we shall see.
And, Voice, this is a business. Money solves many issues and problems if the parties are willing to explore solutions.
Updated On: 8/14/08 at 11:44 PM
Posted: 8/14/08 at 11:49pm
- Yeah. That difficult reputation that people said would keep her from a SECOND TONY? That one??
Lets see if two show Kritzer will have half of the career of LuPone. But to say Karma will strike LuPone because of something SHE created is pretty ridiculous.
Updated On: 8/14/08 at 11:49 PM
Posted: 8/14/08 at 11:52pm
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:04am
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:18am
If you created a show would you want someone to record their self as you doing your show and make profit of of it? I hope Patti did exercise her right to have her show only released with her performing it. That does not make her a diva or a bitch. The point is that she created the show and she should get all rights to the material. She should not have to have her cd compete with an imitation cd. Although imitation is the sencerist form of flatery.
Updated On: 8/15/08 at 12:18 AM
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:22am
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:22am
As for the karma, I refer to LuPone's quashing an aspiring actress's desire to release a recording of her voice to the market. Basically, LuPone stepped on someone who was trying to forge a career for herself. That's the potential karmic payback to which LuPone may be subjected, and has nothing to do whatsoever with shows LuPone did decades ago. You didn't read my post correctly.
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:27am
If you truly love her, celebrate her. Don't fight battles she wouldn't you to fight.
But if, as I suspect, you don't bare about Kritzer but are only here to put down LuPone, STFU, okay?
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:32am
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:32am
Essentially, Kritzer was screwed royally because after all was said and done, only LuPone's CD could be released, and Kritzer's was to be shelved.
And you know this... how?
Posted: 8/15/08 at 12:40am
Posted: 8/15/08 at 3:12am
Neither Patti nor Leslie ever had the fantasy that there was a serious amount of money to be made off of anyone's CDs of Les Mouches... maybe if Kelli Clarkson did the act, but no Broadway singer's album sells enough to really mean much moolah.
Patti didn't want some other bitch mimicking her, particularly as she was about to open in such an important career milestone role as Rose - and the amount of controversy over her performance to this day (months after the rave reviews and seemingly limitless accolades) proves that she was wise to avoid extra areas of potential derision.
Say what you will about copyrights and copycats and karma, but this was never, ever about cash.
BroadwayWorld TV