No, ljay889, I am not out of line at all.
Everyone knows that Leslie Kritzer only proceeded with her show with LuPone's blessing, and Kritzer would not have done it without LuPone green lighting it.
When the opportunity for Leslie Kritzer to record and release a CD of Patti LuPone material presented itself, LuPone realized that there was money to be made out of the commercial success of Kritzer's show, and LuPone seized that opportunity to make money for herself even though Kritzer worked her ass off and rightly deserved her own LESLIE KRITZER AS PATTI LUPONE AT LES MOUCHES CD.
Essentially, Kritzer was screwed royally because after all was said and done, only LuPone's CD could be released, and Kritzer's was to be shelved.
Yes, LuPone could do as she damn well pleases with her own material. But even the copyright laws provide that Leslie Kritzer's own show stands on its own and does not likely constitute an infringement of any sort. Hence, the LuPone and Kritzer CDs could have been released separate and apart from each other or as companion pieces. One didn't have to be tossed aside in favor of the other.
LuPone too was once an aspiring, rising actress-singer. It just leaves such a bad taste in the mouth that LuPone, whom Kritzer admires and adores, ruined Kritzer's chances to have a CD of hers released. Not to mention a letdown to Kritzer's fans who enjoyed her Joe's Pub appearances tremendously.
LuPone has not earned her difficult reputation for nothing. And karma is a bitch, so we shall see.
And, Voice, this is a business. Money solves many issues and problems if the parties are willing to explore solutions.
Updated On: 8/14/08 at 11:44 PM