I haven't posted on here in AGES, but felt compelled to respond with my own taste.
The differences between the two productions are vast-I have seen in NY 10 times, and 7 in London. The reasons Justin D prefers Broadway are some of the reasons I, personally, do not prefer it.
It's worth mentioning that the productions' costumes and wigs are built rather differently... you are seeing productions managed and run in different countries.
The West End production is in a much smaller space (*), and the actors are "turned in" rather than "turned out;"; one will notice a significant more amount of ad-libbing, liberties (within reason), and experimentation down to the ensemble. These are quantifiable observations. Think of it this way- 30 particles in a small bottle has a lot more pressure than 30 particles in one double the size.
So, in NYC, you're getting a big "show business" show. Big, turned out. In London, you're having an intimate experience. Space affects actor intentions and executions.
(*) There are articles in the NY Times from 1986 and 1987 stating a desire to use the Martin Beck because it was as intimate/similar to Her Majesty's. Here is one, for example. Ultimately, as Michael Crawford states in this video, it was about selling more seats at the Majestic... whatever the Shuberts offered to get them to change their mind 4 months later, it must have been financially impassable.
How to properly use its/it's:
Its is the possessive. It's is the contraction for it is...
Updated On: 12/7/16 at 12:05 PM