Question about Audrey Hepburn in My Fair Lady. — Page 2
Posted: 12/15/13 at 12:11am
But of course from her biography, Andrews talks about MY FAIR LADY on stage as follows:
"I got the feeling from Rex's cold and ungenerous attitude that I wasn't making inroads with him," she writes, "and that he was, quite rightly, making a stink about this silly little English girl who couldn't manage the role."
Harrison told the management: "If you don't get rid of that c***, you won't have a show." And the designer Cecil Beaton, who called her a "silly bitch", told her: "You are the most hopelessly unphotogenic person I have ever met."
There is another rumor that Julie Andrews actually had some cosmetic surgery before making MARY POPPINS which helped 'correct' her cinematic appearance, but of course she has never confirmed this. Could be all part of the mythology.
But in any case, it's not hard to see how Jack Warner came to the decision he did when it was time to cast the movie of MY FAIR LADY.
Updated On: 12/15/13 at 12:11 AM
Posted: 12/15/13 at 12:47am

Hopelessly unphotogenic? What a rude thing to say to a young actress! She certainly proved him wrong.
She looks the same to me.
Posted: 12/15/13 at 2:12am
And yes to the poster who said Andrews did not do much in Mary Poppins, which is why I feel like Maria was more of the Oscar winning role to me.
I've read that Audrey and Julie became great friends, and Audrey had confided to her saying something like, "Julie, that role was definitely yours, but I didn't have the guts to turn in down."
Posted: 12/15/13 at 6:24am
"Rex Harrison wanted Julie Andrews for the role of Eliza, since they had played together in the Broadway version. He was concerned that Audrey Hepburn, whose mother was a Dutch baroness, would not be able to play a "guttersnipe" effectively. However, after finishing the film, Harrison had the highest regard for Hepburn's performance, and later referred to her as his favorite leading lady of them all. (It should also be mentioned that Harrison was appalled by Andrews during initial rehearsals for the original Broadway production of "My Fair Lady". Andrews was having a lot of trouble with the characterisation of Eliza Doolittle, and the Cockney accent. So much so, that Harrison was once quoted as saying: 'If that girl is here on Monday giving the same goddamn performance, I am out of this show!')"
and
"Audrey Hepburn later admitted she would never have accepted the role of Eliza Dolittle if she had known that producer Jack L. Warner intended to have nearly all of her singing dubbed. After making "My Fair Lady", Audrey Hepburn resolved not to appear in another film musical unless she could do the singing on her own."
Updated On: 12/15/13 at 06:24 AM
Posted: 12/15/13 at 6:59am
For that reason, I also maintain that Eliza is a very difficult role to pull off convincingly. You either have someone who can't quite get the "lady" or can't quite get the "flower girl." They end up looking awkward at one stage or the other.
I think it's more this case than Hepburn being uncomfortable singing in a musical. She had already sung, using her own voice, in Funny Face with Fred Astaire.
EDIT: (removed the inaccurate info about Deborah Kerr and Marni in An Affair to Remember to avoid confusion)
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 12/15/13 at 06:59 AM
Posted: 12/15/13 at 7:38am
Hepburn knew that Warner was planning on casting Elizabeth Taylor if she turned him down. The role was not going to Julie Andrews, period. Once she understood that, she saw no reason not to take it. She discussed this on an interview she gave Larry King many years later. I remember that she had forgotten Marni Nixon's name, and could only remember that she was a "lovely girl".
Updated On: 12/15/13 at 07:38 AM
Posted: 12/15/13 at 7:56am
My apologies and thanks for the correction.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 12/15/13 at 07:56 AM
Posted: 12/15/13 at 8:06am
I believe Marni was hired for The King And I when the original singer who'd been hired was killed in a car accident. I am not sure who she was.
Posted: 12/15/13 at 8:10am
EDIT: Maureen O'Hara singing (with her own voice) ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcU483A0Fe4
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 12/15/13 at 08:10 AM
Posted: 12/15/13 at 8:50am
Posted: 12/15/13 at 9:09am
And while Kerr was enough of an actress to play barmaids, nuns, tarts, or ladies ... O'Hara wasn't quite as much of a chameleon. She was a good actress and a big movie star ... but not right for Anna.
Today, they would probably cast O'Hara anyway because she could sing it even if she wasn't right for the part. Back then, they would get the casting right, first and foremost, then dub the singing to make it work, if needed. They even dubbed people who could sing (like Rita Moreno in WSS for A Boy Like That, because her own voice wasn't right for the song). There is no "attention to detail" like that today. I miss it.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 12/15/13 at 9:29am
I have seen Maureen O'Hara interviewed and read excerpts from her autobiography and by today's standards she was very much a lady, but in terms of the 1950s you are probably right. It's one thing to go toe to toe against Yul Brynner. It's another to take on John Wayne.
Posted: 12/15/13 at 1:54pm
Posted: 12/15/13 at 2:03pm
It really is a testament to Marni Nixon that you wouldn't be able to tell how much wasn't Audrey's own vocals in My Fair Lady. The only unaltered Audrey song is Just You Wait and it's totally believable with all the mixing and full on dubbing that happened the rest of the film.
Posted: 12/15/13 at 4:50pm
***
Granted, I was only 10, but I don't recall any Julie Andrews fans blaming Audrey Hepburn. Hepburn was also well loved and even fans understood that the decision not to cast Andrews had been made before Hepburn accepted the role.
Posted: 12/15/13 at 4:53pm
Posted: 12/15/13 at 5:13pm
Wendy does very well, don't get me wrong, but she doesn't transform into one of those head-turning creatures of aristocracy the way her musical counterparts did.
And of course, I'm a tad too young to have seen Mrs. Patrick Campbell.
... although Shaw wrote the role for her, and she was the real-life daughter of a count, in addition to being a celebrated actress.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 12/15/13 at 5:19pm
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 12/15/13 at 05:19 PM
Posted: 12/15/13 at 5:51pm
Thinking about this whole issue while taking a shower, I wonder if part of Julie Andrews' problem (and part of the reason neither she nor Hepburn seems a true "guttersnipe") is that despite superficial similarities, L&L's Eliza is ultimately a very different creature than Shaw's.
In PYGMALION, everything points forward to Henry and Eliza's eventual separation; in MY FAIR LADY, everything has to point toward their eventual union.
Or to put it another way, Wendy Hiller never had to sing "Wouldn't It Be Loverly?" and imagine "someone's 'ead resting on my knee/Warm and tender as 'e can be". Of course guttersnipes can dream, but I doubt British guttersnipes dream in American romantic terms.
Now that I think of it, I'm not surprised a 21-year-old Julie Andrews struggled a bit--particularly when, by Lerner's account, Harrison was demanding most of the attention.
Posted: 12/15/13 at 5:56pm
It's hard to imagine THE KING AND I without Deborah Kerr, but O'Hara would have sung it beautifully--certainly better than Gertrude Lawrence.
Posted: 12/15/13 at 6:40pm
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 12/15/13 at 7:27pm
PYGMALION is a brilliant (and hilarious) study of the effects of dialect on social class in Edwardian England. MY FAIR LADY takes Shaw and turns it into CINDERELLA. (And does so very well; this isn't a criticism.)
Posted: 12/15/13 at 8:28pm
Posted: 12/15/13 at 11:08pm
BroadwayWorld TV