Reidel on CHARITY — Page 2

Wicked--Sure, that was my first thought too; but I'm not seeing it. I suppose if it gets people talking and a few people say "Oh, I didn't know they were doing 'Charity'", then maybe it's useful. You would think producers would want to generate positive behind-the-scenes stories, rather than imminent-disaster stories.

But then, I'm not a producer.

---

As MASTERLcZ said, if you insult Mary and Jane, you die.
Why has Neil become so bitter in his old age?
Saw "Rose's Dilemma" while MTM was still in it. Even she couldn't save it.
Neil, don't send wifey to do your dirty work.
Jane would have made an excellent Charity!
Riedel is the only reason to buy that Right Wing rag.

And I'm sure Mason will bring the house down. Margo...who out of the "Steel Magnolias" cast do you think is likely to figure heavily in the awards season? Who might perhaps even win?

Does this article have truth to it?

If so. Simon is a BASTARD.

Simon and Charity...two words that don't go together

---

First of all, magruder, thanks for the laugh. I happen to like the OBC of SUGAR, but it's not because of Elaine Joyce.

Now, back OT... as bta said, this little stunt seems planned. Aside from the fact that Barry and Fran want publicity for their show, if there is a big disagreement between the director, the star, and Neil Simon, they need to do some damage coverage. And Riedel's article did just that -- he reinforced the theory that Simon has lost his mind, and can't get along with ANYBODY anymore.

The outcome? They reassure their director and their star (who are much more important to THIS production than Neil Simon is, regardless of his legendary status), and they can get back to work.

Theoretically, you're right, musicman, he could.

But he won't.

It would spell an instantaneous multi-million dollar loss for the investors, and he'd never get anyone to put money into one of his shows again. (Not that he's having an easy time of that anyhow with his recent track record.)

Veuve--thanks, that makes sense.

---