The whole thing flip flopped around through various hands for nearly ten years before the movie version we have now came into being. At one point, it was in talks to become a tv movie or miniseries. There's nothing untrue about that. Just like prior film versions, i.e. the Spike Lee version and others, it (clearly) never came to pass.
All of those ideas suck. I don't think it was really intended to be made into a movie. It just doesn't lend itself to film. I'm tired of reading things that say what Larson's intentions with it were. At most basic, obviously it was, at the point he left it, intended for stage -- he wrote a musical to be put on stage; that's obvious. And I think it is certainly a piece that lends itself to film, in a general statement about the medium. Yeah, the existing film version has its problems, but the trouble with a piece like this "lending itself" to film isn't so much an issue of the material itself, IMO; it's an issue of how the adaptation is done. The stage show is perfectly adaptable; the product is just very dependent upon
how
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 10/20/06 at 06:16 PM