Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
#1

Revival vs. Transfer?

I was wondering: what qualifies a revival of a show vs. a transfer? In the midst of all the Beetlejuice talk (and I'm not trying to suggest that Beetlejuice will/won't transfer) I had a question about what can be re-eligible for a Tony award? Like I know that both Mamma Mia and Beauty and the Beast transferred to other theaters during their run, but they didn't make significant changes and therefore weren't eligible again. However, if, say, the set design of a show had to be changed to accommodate a different theatre and its constraints, could JUST the set design be eligible? Would the whole production have to be different? Does it depend on the director, the cast - what would make the committee rule in one way or the other?


"I think that when a movie says it was 'based on a true story,' oh, it happened - just with uglier people." - Peanut Walker, Shucked
#2

Revival vs. Transfer?

Revivals, per Tony rules, must occur three years after the closing of the last production or revival and the elements are considered individually in the context of the production in terms of originality and, therefore, eligibility.

When ROCK OF AGES transferred from the Brooks Atkinson to the Helen Hayes (half the original size), everything was scaled down but it was the same essence of the original design and not eligible (also since it was still the original production)


Check out my eBay page for sales on Playbills!! www.ebay.com/usr/missvirginiahamm
#3

Revival vs. Transfer?

The quick answer to pretty much this whole scenario is basically just "no."

None of the elements of the show would be eligible for Tony Awards after transferring to a new theatre. Because, as you say, it's a transfer, not a revival.

The topic of "transfer" vs. "revival" comes up a lot with regards to the Classics Rule, and the way I always try to explain the nuance to people when they are confused, is that you have to look at the context of the production, and ask: what are they doing here by putting on this production? Are they taking an established text and creating a new production of it? Or is Broadway simply the next step on a road that an established production is already on? Is the original production still tied, or affiliated with the current production? Sometimes earlier productions are remounted, and are eligible as revivals: such as How I Learned to Drive, Blackbird, or the remount of the Cabaret revival. So in those cases, you have to ask: has a significant amount of time passed? Is the intent here to dust off and bring back a production from years ago? Or are they just doing a "return engagement" of a recent production?

But with a show moving to a new theatre, you don't even have to consider these questions. Because the answer is plain as day: of course it's still affiliated. Of course this is not a new production. Of course they are not taking an established text and creating a new production of it. Of course this is just the next step for an existing production. Of course there hasn't been a significant enough time gap.

Updated On: 4/10/20 at 01:21 PM

#4

Revival vs. Transfer?

That's the gist of what I thought, but I was just wondering if there were any interesting technicalities. Thanks, you guys!


"I think that when a movie says it was 'based on a true story,' oh, it happened - just with uglier people." - Peanut Walker, Shucked

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $70
Hot Show
Tickets From $106
Hot Show
Tickets From $159