******"Ok, let's stop the mean comments...even though Tir Na Nog was the only one saying them, Don't call someone immature just because they like Wicked I mean my Grandmother loves it...does that not mean she isn't even now mature enough to handle kids?"********
People who think "Wicked" is a good musical aren't immature. They probably donb't have the greatest taste but that is another matter.
*******Tir, what PJ was TRYING to say was that KELLI didn't make a mark on the role. Yes the role is difficult but she was only commenting on the fact that KELLI didn't leave an imprint. Sara on the other hand did because of an amazing belting voice and good comic timing. I don't hear as much talk about Kelli as I do Sara so that means that PJ IS right in saying that Kelli didn't leave an impression while Sara did. There fight is finished let's get on with talking about Sara leaving.*******
Thanks Dad. I wm not fighting with anyone. Just because someone does not agree with you or might think you have bad taste doesn't mean they are fighting with you.
I don't know how much musical theater you guys have seen but saying Sara Ramirez left a print on a noneventful role is kinda naive. When I think of "stamped" or "imprint" roles I think of Joanna Gleason in ITW, Elaine Stritch in Company, "Lansbury in Sweeney, Ruffelle in Les Miserables, or Donna Murphy in Passion.
The point I am trying to make is that people are putting too much time and effort raising up these stupid roles because they have a belter in them. While "REAL" parts that tell real stories are left behind (Thank God for Anika Noni Rose).
This is what the dumbing down of Broadway is all about.
"One difference between poetry and lyrics is that lyrics sort of fade into the background. They fade on the page and live on the stage when set to music". - Stephen Sondheim