"SA is one of those examples of, to me, the original play being better than the adaptation. Everything that is "daring" in the show is to be found in the play."
I have to disagree BFB. After seeing the musical twice, I decided to read Wedekind's original play and I was shocked to find that I thought Sater's adaptation was better in some ways. And this is coming from someone who thought the Book was one of the weaker parts of the musical. Besides the rape, which I wish they would have left in as it was done at Atlantic, Sater's ending is actually an improvement on Wedekind's craziness with Moritz's headless ghost and some mysterious Masked Man. The closure in Wedekind's play is just BAD in my opinion. At least in the musical there is some sense of resolution. I didn't find much of a resolution in the play.
On another note to some on this board:
I realize that many people dislike the show. As someone who has a very diverse variety of tastes in theatre, it is one of the most memorable pieces of theatre I have seen in some time for good reasons. You don't need to be a SNOB to like 'Spring Awakening', just like you don't need to be an ASS if you hate it.
"If you've got something to say, say it, and think well of yourself while you're learning to say it better." - David Mamet