[delurks]
This actually might not necessarily be a bad idea. The reason Dierde Murray gives (or at least the way she articulates it) is too stupid for words; but it might not be a bad idea.
The problem with staging almost any pre-1960s musical (or, in this case, opera-turned-musical) today is that, for economic reasons, it simply isn't possible to hire a big enough orchestra. Even if they really, desperately wanted to be as true as possible to original arrangements, they'd have to downsize the orchestration. Which would make a difference. When Gershwin orchestrated "Summertime", he was counting on having enough strings to create a really lush sound. If you take a part like that and try to play it with too few instruments, it just makes the whole song sound like it's trying to be something it can't.
They can't do the original arrangement properly, so there's something to be said for writing an arrangement that they actually can do.
And even if they
could do the original arrangement properly, it still might be interesting to hear a new arrangement. Just because the original version of something is great doesn't mean good things can't come out of doing it differently.
I'm not saying their version
will be any good. But it's
possible.
One other thing: In the right hands, an accordion can sound
wonderful in a dark lullaby. The Beatles proved that with "Cry Baby Cry".
(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi3hBsZB6Fo)
Updated On: 8/14/11 at 02:24 AM