Sweeney - Original Staging — Page 3
Posted: 12/26/07 at 9:35pm
Posted: 12/26/07 at 9:50pm
Stephen Sondheim wanted to take Christopher Bond's wonderful, SMALL adaptation of 1890's Paris and London Grand Guignol. Prince said he would only do it with his CONCEPT, which was just as much a descration of the score as was Doyle's reductio ad absurdum.
Honestly, I think the movie is the first version to ever do Sondheim justice. Thank you, Tim Burton.
Posted: 12/26/07 at 11:07pm
I've known SS for a long time and he has always been upset about Hal's fixation with "Blecchtian" theatre that inspired the staging of Sweeney. (This has NOTHING to do with their still enduring friendship!)
He always wanted it "at your throat." (Like the 'whisper' references throughout--hence the vocals in the film)
The Doyle version he loved because it was intimate and unsettling. (And puzzle-like)
I know he loves the movie because, again, it brings the blade closer to your own throat...
...And the tension still builds to that brilliant release of Sweeney killing the Judge. This is why Sweeney doesn't need to kill anyone else i.e.; Johanna as a boy--he lets go; he's done killing.
It's all sex. Sondheim teases you until the moment the final spurt is deserved.
After the killing of the Judge, it's just Sweeney coming to terms with his own mortality. He's finished his destiny. Now he's ready to die.
This is why, in both the show and the film, Sweeney opens his neck for Toby to slice it.
It has nothing to do with Toby having gone "nuts" or not. Sweeney is just ready to finally join his wife.
The pieta in the film with Sweeney's blood dripping over his wife's body so beautifully represents the tears he had not been able to shed since his transportation.
That is why Burton's film has truly done great justice to Sondheim's vision.
"Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana." GMarx
Posted: 12/27/07 at 9:20am
after watching the show on youtube a few times i still enjoy the film more. the ending, particularly the scene you pointed out, about the blood dripping onto sweeneys wife's face... that was way way way better than the ending in the show i saw on youtube... much more effective and impressive. its bizarre how the scene itself is so violent and bloody, but i thought it was insanely beautiful in some weird way... morbid i know, but it took my breath away and left me silent and speechless with a knot in my throat...
i do wish i could have seen the original, and i am sure many hardcore fans will always say the original was the best... all i know is i loved this film so much that the score has now become the most played album on my ipod! and i cant wait to rent the dvd of the old tour version... which i know i'll love...
just as long as i never have to sit thru anything like that revival again!!! :)
Posted: 12/27/07 at 9:31am
In "Poor Thing", you just see Patti singing it -- no dream-like recreation is performed counterpointing what she is singing/saying. If the audience isn't REALLY paying attention, the whole story in the song/number is missed.
I kinda enoyed this revival when I saw it on Broadway, but then again...I know SWEENEY TODD inside and out, so I was enjoying the new musical interpretation. I knew what was happening and where the story was going. I can now see what a mess this was to people who didn't know SWEENEY TODD. The sad reality is most who saw this revival (and hated it) will think THIS is how SWEENEY TODD always was performed. This must be happening right now with people seeing the current tour of this revival after seeing Tim Burton's film version.
Posted: 12/27/07 at 11:04am
but i knew nothing of the show at all. absolutely nothing. all i knew was that sweeney was a barber who killed people. lol. so i think i have to fault myself to a certain degree as well for atleast not having read a bit of the synopsis beforehand. which would have helped.
that being said, i still say a great deal of why i didnt enjoy the revival was simply the staging and john doyle's approach to the whole show. it was just boring... it was a concert with costumes. and thats not what i had expected. but of course thats just my opinion...
movie > revival
just my taste i guess...
my hope is that people going to see the revival on tour will see the film beforehand so they'll be able to follow it better... i think that'll help alot and people will enjoy it more that way.
that being said, after seeing the magnificent film people might be really turned off at how drastically simple the revival is. but who knows really...
Updated On: 12/27/07 at 11:04 AM
Posted: 12/27/07 at 11:19am
Posted: 12/27/07 at 11:58am
Posted: 12/27/07 at 1:57pm
so i guess it was a mixture of doyle's production, plus my boredom... haha... that kept it from being a memorable night at the theater. no biggie really. like i said before, had i known a little more of the story beforehand i think it would have been easier to follow and maybe i would have been into it a little more. but just my personal opinion.
i think one thing we can all agree on is that the movie is incredible!
Updated On: 12/27/07 at 01:57 PM
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:00pm

Here's Eugene Lee's sketch for the original set on Broadway.
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:02pm
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:13pm

This photo provides an idea of how the original Broadway set dwarfed the show.
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:14pm
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:20pm
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:23pm
The size of the set didn't bother me. I remember walking into the Uris and my jaw dropping when I saw the stage. I knew I was in for something special!
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:42pm
Family ties were broken, human bonds were severed. People like Beadle and Judge Turpin flourished, treating the poor as disposable cogs in the machine.
But every now and then, peasants like Sweeney and Mrs L. came along to upset the apple cart. They killed and used the machinery of the age - cogs, levers, trapdoors, ovens to facilitate their crimes/revenge.
That was the greatest fear the rich had during the Industrial Revolution - that the people would turn their machinery against them. And eventually, in many countries, they did.
There were huge riots by workers in England, France, Italy - Germany was in a constant state of upheaval - and, of course, Russia, where the workers took over.
Dwarfing the man with the set was a brilliant move on Prince's part. I'm sorry Steve thinks his music was dwarfed, but personally, I felt the outcome at the time was marvelous and I don't remember our greatest living composer whining too much at the opening....
Updated On: 12/27/07 at 02:42 PM
Posted: 12/27/07 at 2:57pm
Posted: 12/28/07 at 2:41pm
BroadwayWorld TV