Ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. I hope he sues and I hope his union is behind him. This right winged, closed minded school should pay the price. Well, if there was anything in the district's "teacher's code of conduct" that prohibits something like nudity, etc, than the union's hands will be tied.
I'm a teacher, and I'll have to go back through my code of conduct to make sure, but I believe I wouldn't be allowed to do something like that either.
Do I think he should be fired? I wish he wouldn't have been. Does the school district have the right to expect their teachers to uphold some kind of a moral code in the interest of the kids? You tell me. I don't think this is as cut/dry as it seems....unless there wasn't
anything outlined in district policy prohibiting him from doing something like this. Then? He might have a case.
I've read where people don't think it's fair to choose between their job and acting roles, but they have to keep in mind that when you choose a profession that involves children (especially when you are in the position of a role model/mentor), choices like that will have to be made. Is it fair? It can be argued. But the bottom line is that there are boundaries you just don't push/cross when you are a teacher, and posing for a nude magazine (in my opinion) is crossing a line. If you want to be nude in a magazine, then choose another profession. If you want to be a teacher and go out for roles that will require nudity, just know that *someone* might have a problem with it. Or do like "evadiva" did above and choose a profession where you don't have to worry about acting choices. It's not always about being able to get/do what you want without having to compromise or make sacrifices...even when it doesn't seem fair.
If one of your teachers had posed nude when you were growing up, you don't think someone under 18 wouldn't have gotten a hold of it and passed it around? Of course they would have. You can't really depend on the fact that because you have to be 18 to buy it, those students under 18 won't have access. Believe me they'll find a way. Then what? Is it ok for the kids to see their teacher nude, even if it wasn't the intent of anyone for the kids to see it? Just throwing the questions out there...as a teacher.
**For the record, I think posing for a magazine and what the teacher did performing in
Full Monty are two different things. The teacher is performing in something people will have to actually make an effort to go see (and kind of an "in the moment" thing) - but a magazine is in print and can be circulated. Is one form of nudity worse than the other?
Updated On: 3/15/07 at 08:30 PM