#51
Posted: 12/25/05 at 5:21pm
My official review:
I TOTALLY understand why all these critics are bashing this movie. I will bet you, to the man (or woman) they are people who hate musicals to begin with or, for whatever reason, hate this show to begin with and went in expecting to hate it. What's on the screen IS the musical currently being seen on Broadway, with a few cuts that in the end didn't really harm the movie (I missed King of Broadway for about ten seconds - though I can't wait to see the footage on the DVD, and I missed "The Intermission" joke in "Betrayed" - but it's made up for by a slight alteration of another meta-joke a few moments earlier.)
The other criticism of this movie - it means nothing, it's fluff, etc. etc. Well, yes, it is. It's not a serious piece of theater or film and doesn't make any pretensions to being more than that. What the play and the film do is transport the audience to a time when musicals were FUN. It's a light, fluffy entertainment where you can go for two hours and laugh. In this time of "serious" movies (this trend of films like Syriana, Munich, Memoirs... etc.) and serious movie musicals (what was the last successful COMEDY?), there's absolutely nothing wrong with a movie where its sole purpose is to ENTERTAIN!
What Susan Stroman has managed to do is to ACTUALLY make a movie of a Broadway musical that really gives the feel of what that experience is like. If you hate the show, or hate musicals, you have no hope here. This movie is 100% theatrical - I feel like I just got back from the "theater" - not the cineplex, but the theater we all love.
Are Lane and Broderick completely over the top? Hell yes, and thank God, because that's what made the show so funny in the first place. Faults with the show itself aside (I agree with those who say some of the music isn't exactly the best the Great White Way has ever offered), this movie is VERY funny and entertaining as anything I've seen in the movies this year. The actors are all spot-on in their performances - I could go into individual performances, but there's no point. They're all great - and Uma Thurman and Will Ferrell (who I usually can't stand) are great fill-ins for their Broadway counterpoints (though I felt very bad for poor Brad Oscar, reduced to a two second cameo!). And that's another great thing for this community -- catching all the Broadway cameos filtered throughout the movie! I had so much fun identifying them - and I don't want to spoil the surprise of who's in here. (Though I have to ask - does anyone know if that was Victoria Clark in the Opening Night sequence - I thought I saw her at the VERY end of it, but it was so fast, and I forgot to check in the credits...).
Anyway, I think this movie is an absolute success. Those criticizing it for being "too theatrical," - I don't think there was any point to NOT making this movie theatrical! We already HAVE a movie of The Producers. What this film does is capture forever the stage show - and yes, at times it literally looks like a stage. But so what??? (And thank you, Ms. Stroman, for filming dance sequences full body rather than "Chorus-Line-from-the-waist-up").
The crowd at the 3/4 full theater I was in (Christmas afternoon), laughed almost continuously through the film. There were even a couple of points where I could FEEL the audience holding back from applauding after a couple of the songs (someone got in two claps after "Betrayed" before realizing what they were doing). The theater ERUPTED in applause afterwards - probably more than I've ever seen a crowd do in a movie theater.
We've seen shows turned into movies countless times, we've seen recordings of stage shows -- this is the first true blending of those two forms. This is a love-letter to Broadway, a wink at the fans of Broadway, and hopefully a sneak-attack on those who would NEVER go see a musical live in the theater.
I TOTALLY understand why all these critics are bashing this movie. I will bet you, to the man (or woman) they are people who hate musicals to begin with or, for whatever reason, hate this show to begin with and went in expecting to hate it. What's on the screen IS the musical currently being seen on Broadway, with a few cuts that in the end didn't really harm the movie (I missed King of Broadway for about ten seconds - though I can't wait to see the footage on the DVD, and I missed "The Intermission" joke in "Betrayed" - but it's made up for by a slight alteration of another meta-joke a few moments earlier.)
The other criticism of this movie - it means nothing, it's fluff, etc. etc. Well, yes, it is. It's not a serious piece of theater or film and doesn't make any pretensions to being more than that. What the play and the film do is transport the audience to a time when musicals were FUN. It's a light, fluffy entertainment where you can go for two hours and laugh. In this time of "serious" movies (this trend of films like Syriana, Munich, Memoirs... etc.) and serious movie musicals (what was the last successful COMEDY?), there's absolutely nothing wrong with a movie where its sole purpose is to ENTERTAIN!
What Susan Stroman has managed to do is to ACTUALLY make a movie of a Broadway musical that really gives the feel of what that experience is like. If you hate the show, or hate musicals, you have no hope here. This movie is 100% theatrical - I feel like I just got back from the "theater" - not the cineplex, but the theater we all love.
Are Lane and Broderick completely over the top? Hell yes, and thank God, because that's what made the show so funny in the first place. Faults with the show itself aside (I agree with those who say some of the music isn't exactly the best the Great White Way has ever offered), this movie is VERY funny and entertaining as anything I've seen in the movies this year. The actors are all spot-on in their performances - I could go into individual performances, but there's no point. They're all great - and Uma Thurman and Will Ferrell (who I usually can't stand) are great fill-ins for their Broadway counterpoints (though I felt very bad for poor Brad Oscar, reduced to a two second cameo!). And that's another great thing for this community -- catching all the Broadway cameos filtered throughout the movie! I had so much fun identifying them - and I don't want to spoil the surprise of who's in here. (Though I have to ask - does anyone know if that was Victoria Clark in the Opening Night sequence - I thought I saw her at the VERY end of it, but it was so fast, and I forgot to check in the credits...).
Anyway, I think this movie is an absolute success. Those criticizing it for being "too theatrical," - I don't think there was any point to NOT making this movie theatrical! We already HAVE a movie of The Producers. What this film does is capture forever the stage show - and yes, at times it literally looks like a stage. But so what??? (And thank you, Ms. Stroman, for filming dance sequences full body rather than "Chorus-Line-from-the-waist-up").
The crowd at the 3/4 full theater I was in (Christmas afternoon), laughed almost continuously through the film. There were even a couple of points where I could FEEL the audience holding back from applauding after a couple of the songs (someone got in two claps after "Betrayed" before realizing what they were doing). The theater ERUPTED in applause afterwards - probably more than I've ever seen a crowd do in a movie theater.
We've seen shows turned into movies countless times, we've seen recordings of stage shows -- this is the first true blending of those two forms. This is a love-letter to Broadway, a wink at the fans of Broadway, and hopefully a sneak-attack on those who would NEVER go see a musical live in the theater.
Hi, Shirley Temple Pudding.
Updated On: 12/25/05 at 05:21 PM