#1
Posted: 3/26/09 at 8:40pm
I found this article kinda inane. The "critic" starts the piece by saying:
"As someone who likes to think I have a fairly complete education in the Broadway musical, however, one show holds a special place: West Side Story. Of all the widely accepted masterpieces of the genre, it's the one I have never seen onstage. Nor even ? until a few weeks ago, when I finally broke down and rented the DVD ? the multiple-Oscar-winning 1961 movie. Of course, I know most of the Leonard Bernstein?Stephen Sondheim score; I've seen enough clips to be familiar with the famed Jerome Robbins choreography; and I'd have to be a pretty benighted theatergoer not to know at least the central conceit of the story ? Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet transplanted to the street gangs of New York City in the 1950s."
WHA?? He's a musical theatre critic for a major nationwide magazine and had never seen even the movie of WSS till now?? That seems like a drama critic saying he had heard enough excerpts from Hamlet so didn't need to bother seeing the full thing.
And his verdict is it's not quite the classic it's meant to be. yet he bases this verdict solely on the revival which he even aknowledges is quite changed from the original production. This bit floored me:
"What's more ? a heresy to even suggest ? I wonder if this score really belongs in the very top rank of American musicals. The jazzy, modernist, Gershwinesque rhythms of some of Bernstein's music ? "The Jet Song," "America" ? are still striking and original. But is there a duller love ballad in any major American musical than "Maria" ("Maria! I just met a girl named Maria!"), or its Muzak-ready twin brother, "Tonight" ("Tonight, tonight/ There's only you tonight")? "
??? I love both songs, particularly Maria, and maybe he overdosed on cover versions of it or something but come on. He can't think of ANY Broadway ballad that's mor boring or Muzak-ey than those two great love songs? WTF?
http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1887470,00.html
"As someone who likes to think I have a fairly complete education in the Broadway musical, however, one show holds a special place: West Side Story. Of all the widely accepted masterpieces of the genre, it's the one I have never seen onstage. Nor even ? until a few weeks ago, when I finally broke down and rented the DVD ? the multiple-Oscar-winning 1961 movie. Of course, I know most of the Leonard Bernstein?Stephen Sondheim score; I've seen enough clips to be familiar with the famed Jerome Robbins choreography; and I'd have to be a pretty benighted theatergoer not to know at least the central conceit of the story ? Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet transplanted to the street gangs of New York City in the 1950s."
WHA?? He's a musical theatre critic for a major nationwide magazine and had never seen even the movie of WSS till now?? That seems like a drama critic saying he had heard enough excerpts from Hamlet so didn't need to bother seeing the full thing.
And his verdict is it's not quite the classic it's meant to be. yet he bases this verdict solely on the revival which he even aknowledges is quite changed from the original production. This bit floored me:
"What's more ? a heresy to even suggest ? I wonder if this score really belongs in the very top rank of American musicals. The jazzy, modernist, Gershwinesque rhythms of some of Bernstein's music ? "The Jet Song," "America" ? are still striking and original. But is there a duller love ballad in any major American musical than "Maria" ("Maria! I just met a girl named Maria!"), or its Muzak-ready twin brother, "Tonight" ("Tonight, tonight/ There's only you tonight")? "
??? I love both songs, particularly Maria, and maybe he overdosed on cover versions of it or something but come on. He can't think of ANY Broadway ballad that's mor boring or Muzak-ey than those two great love songs? WTF?
http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1887470,00.html