I find it interesting that those bothered by my post assume that I'm a Conservative, and can only reply with snark as opposed to critically engaging with the thoughts I laid out (I welcome those that did).
I will add that Mr. O'Hare and his husband, in my view, are teaching his son that the way to confront problems is to try and escape them, as opposed to staying and fighting for what you believe in.
Of course Mr. O'Hare and family are free to do as they wish, just as I am free to criticize his actions. One does not have to be a Conservative to recognize geopolitical trends and share that information within the context of this conversation, and make the argument that due to what I can only assume is a lack of knowledge of these trends, he may be moving from a situation that he feels is bad, to one that is potentially worse (based on your perspective). Just as an example, I am not the only poster who has noted the rise in anti-Liberal ideologies in Europe, and I doubt Mr. O'Hare would have chosen Paris (as opposed to, say, somewhere like Iceland) as a safe haven had he been aware of these issues.
And GeorgeAndDot, if I watched cable news every night, which has engaged in relentless fearmongering regarding the Right-wing, I'm sure I would be afraid as well. I stopped patronizing these outlets years ago due to growing weary of their sensationalist coverage, which I feel is only increasing tensions between people for the sake of ratings and profit (which I feel is deeply unethical).
Updated On: 8/6/18 at 09:05 PM