Posted: 12/30/15 at 7:11pm
Something I am often unsure about is how can we distinguish the contribution of an actor and director to a performance from the perspective of an audience member?
For example, Bernadette's performance in FOLLIES was/is sometimes criticised for crying during "Losing My Mind". But how do we know if Bernadette or the director made this decision? I suppose Bernadette would have a lot more power over directors than most, so perhaps her performance could be more a product of her own vision than a directors (though this may not be true at all). But still.
The whole CSC Mother Courage incident highlights how much control a director can apparently have over a creative performance.
Similarly, I managed to get through a lot of the London GYPSY broadcast. She plays the role VERY unsympathetically, "psychotic" is a good word to describe it. However, I look at her Rose's Turn and think she is a very good actress - but maybe the vision of the character and the choices made during her performance (including Rose's Turn) aren't the greatest (I still haven't made my mind up yet). In this case, is it her fault or the directors?
Updated On: 12/30/15 at 07:11 PM