1) There are roughly 760 voters (not sure this year's exact number -- I've seen 3 different figures) consisting of actors, directors, designers, playwrights, composers, stage managers and crew, choreographers, producers and road presenters and their associates (who apparently make up about 20% of the total) and other theatre professionals.
2) As I said in another thread, while voters may respect and admire what Doyle did with this rethinking of Sweeney Todd, the final vote tally indicates to me that they actually had a better time and more fun at Pajama Game and voted that preference. This is not a comparison of the quality of the underlying shows themselves -- many of those who voted for PJ would certainly agree that Sweeney is the superior work of art (although it's never been a particularly popular one except to musical afficionados) -- it's a comparison of the respective productions. And for a plurality of the voters, they decided they enjoyed a bright, splashy, well-produced production that blew the dust off of an old chestnut like PJ to a dark, somber, minimalist, unsettling take on Sweeney (not to mention, I've heard many, including some Tony voters, express their preference for the more epic Prince original version to this stripped down one). And let's not forget that as acclaimed as Sweeney was critically, Pajama Game did get across the board enthusiastic raves when it opened. It winning really shouldn't be that much of a surprise.
3) The sooner you get the notion that the Tonys are solely about pure artistic merit, the better off you'll be. They NEVER have been (at least since 1967 when they started being televised) and never will be.
"What a story........ everything but the bloodhounds snappin' at her rear end." -- Birdie
[http://margochanning.broadwayworld.com/]
"The Devil Be Hittin' Me" -- Whitney
Updated On: 6/12/06 at 12:23 AM