Was He Nominated Because He's Old?
Was He Nominated Because He's Old?
Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#1
Posted: 5/14/08 at 2:20amThere have been five productions of GYPSY on Broadway. Arthur Laurents directed three of them. He won the Tony for Best Direction of a Musical (Gypsy) in 1975, but wasn't nominated in 1989. He was nominated for the current production. Seems like overkill to me. Was he nominated because he's old?
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#2
Posted: 5/14/08 at 2:28am
Possibly because the current production has stellar actors, and the overall effect is superior to the 1989 version. I don't really think "old" is considered here (why should it be, and why shoould they give someone a nomination/award, other than merit...?
Certainly, when I'm old, I hope they will not be looking at me as an "old" person, but as a still vibrant, contributing member of the process, whatever that might be.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#2
Posted: 5/14/08 at 2:32am
why should they give someone a nomination/award, other than merit...?
Hahah! Did you look at the list of nominations?
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#3
Posted: 5/14/08 at 2:42amI think merit went out the window when the nominations were annoucned...
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#4
Posted: 5/14/08 at 2:46am
CATS...right as ususal! What WAS I thinking 
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#5
Posted: 5/14/08 at 2:47amHe was nominated for his sex appeal!
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#6
Posted: 5/14/08 at 2:57am
BobbyBubby ... :I ...
Although I think we all will be considered sometime in our lives as having great "sex appeal" by someone else...Now, isn't that comforting and reassuring :)
Updated On: 5/14/08 at 02:57 AM
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#7
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:00amBart Sher is going to win the Tony!
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#8
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:07am
Wait! What happenned to Laurents' "sex appeal"...?!
(maybe it was good for a nom, not a win :/...)
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#9
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:17amI hear he's doing Playgirl to push his chances at a win.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#10
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:21am
BB--Ha!
But, maybe he will be "blacklisted" in Broadway for posing nude, don't you think...?
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#11
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:24am
Didn't hurt Vanessa Williams...
And really, don't Vanessa Williams and Arthur Laurents go hand in hand?
Seriously, he's nominated but he ain't gonna win.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#12
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:28am
mmm...liver spots get me all hot and bothered.
Bartlett Sher will win the Tony.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#13
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:28am
Arthur Laurents didn't win the Tony in 1975. Geoffrey Holder did for THE WIZ.
Personally, I find it kinda funny that he got nominated twice for doing essentially the same thing. Much like James Lapine's two Best Director nominations for INTO THE WOODS.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#14
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:33amWell, I wouldn't be thrilled if Bartlet Sher won. I don't like his South Pacific as much as the Trevor Nunn Royal National Theatre revival. I'm not sure who I would pick for best director though when Patti wins I guess it would be fitting if the man partly responsible for her performance also won, but I'd like to think he'd have a better chance if the production itself wasn't so cheep looking. I honestly hope that plays a small factor in the decision making.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#15
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:39amHe's the director. Not the designer.
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#16
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:40amAnd the director could tell the designer to get rid of that ugly painted sheet.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#17
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:41amWell, the show did get a nod for Best Costume Design, so the Nominating Committee certainly didn't have a problem with it.
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#18
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:42amThey didn't seem to have a problem with a lot of things...
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#19
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:45amI know what you mean. I'm not a fan of that smock either. I think it's hideous. But I think Laurents' work with LuPone in the turnaround of her portrayal of Rose from City Center to Broadway should weigh more in judging his work as a director over a costume when he is the director and not the costume designer.
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#20
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:52amI agree. Which is why I find it strange when sometimes actors are nominated and directors aren't. I know there's only so much room, but a lot of actors wouldn't be as great as they are if it weren't for great directors.
re: Was He Nominated Because He's Old?#21
Posted: 5/14/08 at 3:59am
...and, you could run out of time (not to mention money) to push for a different approach to the set. This happens sometimes, but as noted, the director should concentrate first and foremost on directing the actors and the way the play develops.
However, on the other hand, if "I" was the director, I would definitely pay attention to the set, costuming, EVERYTHING, since it all is a reflection of the overall impact of the production. Just my HO.
Videos
