It's a traditional, proscenium-style musical.
They're calling it an "unforgettable theatrical experience" because it seems like they want it to have the intellectual weight of a Light in the Piazza, and not be confused as a "MUSICAL!", as if they think all musicals are The Boyfriend or (the fictionalized) The Drowsy Chaperone and their serious artistic endeavor is above being thought of as those.
For reasons that they tout: the composer wrote the show in dramatic order "abandoning musical theatre conventions to propel the story through song", I found it extremely hard to listen to, and even harder to be compelled by. They recorded the entire show with cast and piano and then a few of the songs for full orchestra a few years ago and you can find bits and pieces of it all over the internet.
To me it feels like an assembly of film music cues: musicalized moments and ideas that sometimes build into perfectly pleasant songs, but leave the overall work rather devoid of a traditional structure. The breakout numbers are ... pretty, but don't really add much to the repertoire.
I suspect that a very visual director (and a large budget) could craft a rather stunning production with the material, but it seems like it needs a director who can advocate for its audience and force them to do the dramaturgical /score work that allows you to emotionally connect with the characters not just watch them sing at you. I really felt like the show just washed over me and then I left.
They're raising money for a spring workshop in the hopes that it (and the two "sold out" presentations they gave in NY this year) will give them the momentum to be Broadway-aimed. I truly hope that they use the workshop to work on the piece and not just as an extended backers audition.
Here's a very old interview on it: https://playbill.com/article/stritch-and-gibson-help-read-operatic-little-women-april-23-24-com-96199
Updated On: 12/19/23 at 01:41 PM