I saw this yesterday afternoon and agree with most of what has been written about the play. The first act just plugs along without ever going anywhere. It wasn't unwatchable, but it wasn't engaging either. The tone shifted wildly, more due to the performances than the text, depending who was on stage. It went from attempted sobering drama to CBS multi-cam sitcom in the blink of an eye.
There's also so much stage business going on, and it distracts rather than enhances. Perhaps McKinnon, knowing the weaknesses of the script, decided to gussy it up with all the trimming, but all I could focus on was Cherry Jones mixing batter and baking pumpkin cardamon muffins.
Act two was better, but only in comparison and simply because things started to happen. I thought Cherry's acting in the final two seasons was impressive.
The one thing I disagree with others about is wondering why Jones chose to do the play in the first place, and this does come with a slight spoiler so.......
I think the obvious draw for Jones is getting the chance to play a lesbian character in a play that dealt heavily with women's rights/feminist thought. Perhaps she identifies with the character and it certainly makes a personal statement that her other roles haven't allowed for. It's not a good play, but I get why she'd want the part.
Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco.
Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!