"MOVIE MUSCIALS ARE FOR MIDWESTERNERS WHO ARE ISOLATED AND CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT REAL THEATRE IS ABOUT."
Excuse you but I am NOT a midwesterner and I enjoy movie musicals just fine. Just because it's a musical based on a movie doesn't mean it's not original. It's taken a plot that's already written and writing an ORIGINAL score for it. The music is new. The staging is new. The dancing is new. Even some of the writing is new.
Do you have any idea how many musicals have been created that are based on an already existing work? Whether it be movies, novels, historical events...whatever. Most of these "original musicals" are musicals that have taken some form of a story that has already been written and creating a musical based off of it. Movie musicals are more prevalent because it's more noticable and the titles are easily recognizable. Does that make the material bad? NO!
RENT was based on LA BOHEME.
MISS SAIGON was based on MADAME BUTTERFLY.
CABARET was based on THE BERLIN STORIES.
CHICAGO was based on an already written play named CHICAGO.
WICKED was based on a novel of the same name.
AVENUE Q is a parody of children's television shows.
LES MISERABLES is based on a novel.
CATS is based on a book by T.S. Elliot.
INTO THE WOODS is a take on Grimm's Fairy Tales.
GYPSY is based on an autobiography.
LA CAGE AUX FOLLES is based on a movie.
The list continues. All of these are "original musicals" but they have been based off of an already established work. Does that make them un-original? I don't think so.
"I love talking about nothing. It is the only thing I know anything about." - Oscar Wilde
Updated On: 6/25/05 at 09:53 PM