Posted: 3/3/24 at 9:50am
As it happens, there's a "12 Angry Women" version of the better-known play. I think it may actually have the same author as the original, ... and it's "a special case" in a couple of ways. WHAT I wonder is why - this being Women's History Month - there are so few similar (and better) ventures. Yes, there have been many Shakespeare plays - I'm not sure whether they bother changing a word - where women play juicy men's roles - but he is, after all, in the public domain ... and has name recognition like nobody else.... But I'll be using "Death of a Salesman" with a class of mostly women in a class next month. In a word, awkward! And one could make a VERY, very long list of similar plays. I'm just wondering if the handful of VERY well-endowed all-women colleges (and a large number of single sex boarding schools) or some affluent women could come up with enough money to award prizes to the best such adaptations. Yes, there are rights issues, but I submit that this cries out to be done. Obviously, some plays present far greater challenges than others - I suspect that there IS a correlation between difficulty and "prominence." Can you imagine "Fences," say, with a female lead? ... It's another question whether the large genre of 2-handers (some romantic) would be "worth" (would they be performed?) revising, but let's leave that to another day.
I REALLY DO welcome feedback. Related, any suggestions for plays as meaty as Doll's House ... but with 2 or more meaty parts conventionally designated "female?" Yes, "Raisin." But there ought to be a dozen or more, and I'll bet one would get oh so obscure to reach that number!