#1
Posted: 7/13/07 at 12:13am
Stephen King and John Mellencamp. Somehow I wouldn't picture those two venturing out to the Walter Kerr, but they've obviously got great taste. I say it was King who suggested it, but what do I know.
Anyway, this was my second time seeing the show. Saw it first in Previews for the Broadway run. I did think Christine Ebersole was a little less energetic than the first time around, and maybe she is getting over something because some of the vocals seemed a little clipped. Other than that, though, she was brilliant again, as far as I am concerned. My feeling is that the rumors of Ebersole "phoning it in" are a little exaggerated.
As I said, this was my second time seeing it, and though I have listened to both the Off Broadway and Broadway cast recordings about a thousand times, I was shocked that this time around I was discovering so much more depth that I didn't see in the first viewing. Grey Gardens, in particular, seems a demanding mistress. Sometimes dense lyrically, with the references and the subtext. So much more to see on repeat viewings.
The first act was less than thrilling for me the first time around and this time I was able to more appreciate the psychological set-up of the characters. The foreshadowing of 2nd act tensions between Little and Big Edie, the clear and ceaseless messages these women got about womanhood from the men around them, the abusive and absent Phelan Beale, the heartbreaking agony of Little and Big Edie in Act I, and the stunning betrayal they both experienced. All stuff I sort of got the first time around but didn't have the luxury of enjoying because I was so darned anxious to see Little Edie, circa 1973.
Ebersole got thunderous applause and hoots and bravos for Revolutionary Costume. Went on for quite some time. Her reaction to the adulation was all Little Edie. But then, it always is. I'm so glad you're here.
To go back to the notion of Ebersole "phoning it in", I brought a friend tonight for her birthday and she was blown away by the performances and the complexity of the Little and Big Edie characters. She didn't have any hesitation or disappointment about the performances. Maybe there's a little less energy on the stage, but it's still more than enough. At least for me and the people around me. It felt, again, like I was really, really lucky to be there. It made me proud to be a New Yorker and be supporting work of this caliber.
Oh yeah, and I can't help wondering what Stephen King and John Mellencamp thought. Maybe I should have asked them.
Anyway, this was my second time seeing the show. Saw it first in Previews for the Broadway run. I did think Christine Ebersole was a little less energetic than the first time around, and maybe she is getting over something because some of the vocals seemed a little clipped. Other than that, though, she was brilliant again, as far as I am concerned. My feeling is that the rumors of Ebersole "phoning it in" are a little exaggerated.
As I said, this was my second time seeing it, and though I have listened to both the Off Broadway and Broadway cast recordings about a thousand times, I was shocked that this time around I was discovering so much more depth that I didn't see in the first viewing. Grey Gardens, in particular, seems a demanding mistress. Sometimes dense lyrically, with the references and the subtext. So much more to see on repeat viewings.
The first act was less than thrilling for me the first time around and this time I was able to more appreciate the psychological set-up of the characters. The foreshadowing of 2nd act tensions between Little and Big Edie, the clear and ceaseless messages these women got about womanhood from the men around them, the abusive and absent Phelan Beale, the heartbreaking agony of Little and Big Edie in Act I, and the stunning betrayal they both experienced. All stuff I sort of got the first time around but didn't have the luxury of enjoying because I was so darned anxious to see Little Edie, circa 1973.
Ebersole got thunderous applause and hoots and bravos for Revolutionary Costume. Went on for quite some time. Her reaction to the adulation was all Little Edie. But then, it always is. I'm so glad you're here.
To go back to the notion of Ebersole "phoning it in", I brought a friend tonight for her birthday and she was blown away by the performances and the complexity of the Little and Big Edie characters. She didn't have any hesitation or disappointment about the performances. Maybe there's a little less energy on the stage, but it's still more than enough. At least for me and the people around me. It felt, again, like I was really, really lucky to be there. It made me proud to be a New Yorker and be supporting work of this caliber.
Oh yeah, and I can't help wondering what Stephen King and John Mellencamp thought. Maybe I should have asked them.