#26
Posted: 1/9/06 at 10:47am
As a classicaly trained singer who sings along to Broadway recordings in the car and in the shower, I'd like to put my two cents in.
I tend to think of belting and using your chest voice as two different things...belting being more of a stylistical way of discering the use of the head voice (what you'd think of as legit singing) and your chest voice. Then there's the mix, which I think of (for my own use and technique) as your head voice with the placement you use for your chest voice. I use my chest voice all the time when I'm singing classical repertoire, but I wouldn't call it belting. Neither would I belt every song in Rent...depending on the range and the context, I would use every part of my voice. Now, every singer is different, and while technique may overlap, we all use different words to describe what's happening when we use different parts of our voice. That's my own take on the subject.
Knowing your own voice and its capabilities is the way that we can prevent bad belting from becoming a worldwide epidemic. As OddExoticCreature was saying, don't try to be someone else vocally...don't try to sing exactly like Idina Menzel, Sutton Foster, and every other star out there. Learn from them, appreciate them, but trying to sound exactly like them is a waste of time, and you're not being true to yourself and your capabilities as an artist. For example, I can't belt an F, so I learned how to use my mix to get the sound that I want when I sing "The Story Goes On" (again, in the privacy of my car and my shower...but it's still a good lesson in how to use the voice you have, not the voice that you want after listening to Liz Callaway sing it...and who knows, it may come in handy someday...).
That being said, as I step off my soapbox, I hope I don't come off as a snot, I just wanted to write my take on the subject, hoping it would make sense to someone out there.
I tend to think of belting and using your chest voice as two different things...belting being more of a stylistical way of discering the use of the head voice (what you'd think of as legit singing) and your chest voice. Then there's the mix, which I think of (for my own use and technique) as your head voice with the placement you use for your chest voice. I use my chest voice all the time when I'm singing classical repertoire, but I wouldn't call it belting. Neither would I belt every song in Rent...depending on the range and the context, I would use every part of my voice. Now, every singer is different, and while technique may overlap, we all use different words to describe what's happening when we use different parts of our voice. That's my own take on the subject.
Knowing your own voice and its capabilities is the way that we can prevent bad belting from becoming a worldwide epidemic. As OddExoticCreature was saying, don't try to be someone else vocally...don't try to sing exactly like Idina Menzel, Sutton Foster, and every other star out there. Learn from them, appreciate them, but trying to sound exactly like them is a waste of time, and you're not being true to yourself and your capabilities as an artist. For example, I can't belt an F, so I learned how to use my mix to get the sound that I want when I sing "The Story Goes On" (again, in the privacy of my car and my shower...but it's still a good lesson in how to use the voice you have, not the voice that you want after listening to Liz Callaway sing it...and who knows, it may come in handy someday...).
That being said, as I step off my soapbox, I hope I don't come off as a snot, I just wanted to write my take on the subject, hoping it would make sense to someone out there.