deleted

[theperformer]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 7:47am

I need to decide on whether to see 110 in the Shade or Company. Any suggestions?

Thank you!
Updated On: 5/28/07 at 07:47 AM

[Testing1232]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 7:54am

Loved Raul, but "110" is my fave show right now !! Awesome !!

[Jellylorum]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 7:56am

I haven't seen 110, but Company is fantastic.

[courtnyj]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 7:58am

110.

[mint0621]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:01am

Company! Definitely.

[jordangirl]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:09am

110!

Company did nothing for me.

[Dirty_Rotten_Guy]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:11am

havent seen 110 yet, but just from seeing COMPANY, id go with 110 IN THE SHADE
like jordangirl, COMPANY didn't do much for me.

[Horton]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:13am

I thought Company was very ehh, I wast even that crazy about Raul.

[courtnyj]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:18am

agreed.

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:28am

110

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:28am

110

[BroadwayChica]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 8:48am

Company.

110 in the Shade is a great production, and Audra is wonderful, but the musical itself is....bleh. Not a great score, a trite cutesy story... I didn't care for it. Plus, I hate singing cowboys (*hides*)

Company's an inventive production of a masterpiece. And Raul Esparza is superb.

[Wanna Be A Foster]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 9:05am

theperformer, is there a reason why you can't see both? There are affordable ticket options for both shows. Or is it a time issue?

[Cat2]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 9:11am

110

[Testing1232]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 9:14am

Agree with the others.. as much I as I liked Raul, "Company" left me cold.

[broadwayboy1939]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 12:58pm

Didn't see 110, but I loved Company!

[sing_dance_love]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 1:05pm

Splurge a little and see both! They're fantastic!

Hope you have fun.

[luvtheEmcee]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 1:14pm

I haven't gotten to see 110 yet, but whatever -- see Company. That show exemplifies the reasons why we go to the theater. You don't want to miss it.

Updated On: 5/27/07 at 01:14 PM

[BroadwayGirl107]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 1:15pm

The only reason to see 110 is Audra McDonald; the show is pretty lousy, as is a good deal of the production and the cast besides Audra.

Company is the best thing I've seen on Broadway, and as much as I love Audra, I think some of Raul's work in Company is a notch above what Audra is doing in 110.

See Company.

[Clayford27]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 1:21pm

"I haven't gotten to see 110 yet, but whatever -- see Company. That show exemplifies the reasons why we go to the theater. You don't want to miss it."

Agreed. I'd see Company.

[gustof777]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 1:27pm

I would have to say 110 but please PLEASE if you have the oppurtunity to see more...go see Company. Raul, as everyone has already said, is beyond amazing and the production is wonderful and lord knows it needs as many butts in the seats as it can get. But IF you'd have to choose, I'd go with 110 just because it's a gorgeous production of a really beautiful show (IMO) with a superb cast and Audra is at her best and there is NOTHING like seeing this woman at the top of her game.

[Sondheim Geek]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 1:53pm

Company. IMHO, there's only one reason to see 110, Audra. People may say the same thing about Raul/Company, but even if you dislike Doyle's direction, there's still the magnificent score/book. I personally adore the production.

[BDavis0092]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 3:00pm

https://forum.broadwayworld.com/readmessage.cfm?thread=935859#3029907

I vote for Company...again.

[neddyfrank2]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 3:07pm

Company

[TheaterAddict7652]

Posted: 5/27/07 at 3:35pm

I haven't seen 110 either, but see Company. It was the most moving night I have ever spent in the theater.