just back from LOVE NEVER DIES - Loved it

Wow - I cannot begin to say how much I enjoyed it.

I had never seen the London Production, and while I enjoyed the music on the concept album, I didn't listen to it a lot. The story seemed hard to go along with.

But what a difference a couple years, a new continent, new creative team make... Wow - was tearing up at "Look with your heart"; even though I knew the story, I actually felt the tension with whether Christine would sing or not (the shots of Raoul and the Phantom really made it that much more dramatic).

The music sounded so lush and superb - and the alterations were great (love the scene before "LND" with the Phantom putting the necklace on Christine) even scenes I never cared for -- the beauty underneath -- I found exciting.

I hope this helps bring LND to Broadway... would love to see this live. Just the Coney Island Waltz alone, there was so much to take in, that this beautiful film couldn't possibly have captured it all.

Congrats ALW and the Cast and Crew - it was a brutal process, but it's great to see LND's potential fully realized.

Yeah Jordan, I was thinking the same thing... I enjoyed Phantom a lot, but the music and everything really seemed to move things along. Perhaps because its new, but I like it better than Phantom.

I really would love to see this production come to New York. It looks like it would be spectacular in person.

It's a very intimate filming of the show and it's only towards the very end when there's a full stage shot (which these filmed musicals need more of, by the way) that you get a feel for the scope of it. It also seems like the stage is not that big so what they did with the space they had was really incredible.

Wait, people like this crap unironically?!

---

It's is a very good PRODUCTION, but my sister and I both walked away feeling that it is still a very flawed SHOW.

The final scene seemed tortuously slow, even though they were virtually hanging above us in the third row.

I know next to nothing of this show but I did like the music the one time I listened to it. I've never been in on the constantly negative commentary around the internet but I also did not mind it as the idea seems hopelessly tacky and cheesy. The title alone seems to have been thrown onto the marquee at the very last minute due to how corny it is.

I used to be a Phantom nut but have since found it to be one of the most unsatisfying nights at the theatre for how pedestrian it is. I always will admire the production itself: Hal's direction, Maria's gorgeously iconic designs, Lynne's evocative choreography, Bridge's moody lighting, and ALW's sumptuously orchestrated score. But the characters, plot I've never really cared much for. The few times I did care it was all momentary push-button emotionalism since nowadays I find it impossible to care for a lunatic serial killer. When you're a kid, you innocently buy into things that tell you how to feel, something I find gratingly annoying now as an adult. I will say I sort of miss that naivete and the joy Phantom brought as a result.

I'd still enjoy it if that were the only problem. I can be laid back and easy going, you know, but I just don't care at all for Christine as a character. The rest of them, much less. So the show is and always will be about stagecraft, the music, its irresistible visual style, and the show's best character of all...that darn chandelier.

So, I guess LND seems to have taken those characters and made them into people we can actually care about, eh? But it still features a serial killer ghost who bemoans his fugliness, no? And what's this about Meg Giry being an evil slut with Mme. Giry being the same sinister creature who is the only one sporting a French accent? The whole thing sounds like a bad dream, and if that is the case, I'd rather be dreaming with the murderous ghost and his chandelier instead!

But happy to see Lordy Webber have another crack at making the show as good as the score that accompanies it.

I wish him much success.

---

Wow. This is NOT at all the reaction I expected from BWW. At least I'm reassured that I wasn't the only one in the theater last night filled with incredulous laughter.

---

I still need one thing answered: who were the coneheaded chil'ren following the man on the giant trike? I hate that song - love this staging - but seriously... why were they referencing a skit from SNL in the 70s?

---

how is Meg a slut??

Raoul became a drunk because of his gambling... although he wasn't really portrayed as a drunk drunk... more as a drinker...

the ending reminded me of the Matrix Revolutions when everyone in our theater was like... DIE already Trinity!!! haha... and yeah... Christine sure did sing a lot before dying! haha...

and did anyone not like the interview before the show started?? it was just edited really bad and it went on for far too long... after it was over some guy in my theater yelled out something like "thank you, it's about time"... ha

and did anyone not like the interview before the show started?? it was just edited really bad and it went on for far too long... after it was over some guy in my theater yelled out something like "thank you, it's about time"... ha


Agreed. Why did they use the same 3 or 4 scenes over and over again during ALW's desperate plea for us to like it?

---

It is a beautiful production, the score is nice, the performances are fine, but the story is still terrible.

It irks me to no end that I am expected to believe that a woman would return to her kidnapping, murderous stalker for a night of consensual sex shortly before her wedding to her childhood sweetheart. "He kills without a thought, he murders all that's good," yeah, that's just the person I want to bone before my wedding.

I was not a fan of the songs the Phantom and Christine sing when they first meet in the hotel room. It didn't have the oomph I was hoping for for their reunion

I agree! I found this part so boring. And I was watching it from the rear mezz, which I imagine it is a lot worse from than the close-up filming.

---

Updated On: 2/29/12 at 04:51 PM